Azad, who floated the Democratic Progressive Azad Party (DPAP) after parting ways with the Congress, said he cannot foresee Parliament reversing the decisions taken on August 5, 2019
A constitution bench has reviewed the challenge to the abrogation of Article 370, exploring the constitutionality of the process and its impact on Jammu and Kashmir's special privileges
On Monday, SC will deliver its verdict on a batch of pleas challenging the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution which conferred special status on the erstwhile State of J&K
Elections should be a precursor of statehood
The apex court likely to announce verdict on batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and its corollary Article 35-A, which provided special constitutional guarantees to J&K
Shah said "Narendra Modi has corrected it. The entire country wanted it." This comment was made in an apparent reference to the abrogation of provisions of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir
The home minister hit out at the Congress for what he called destroying the culture of the country and said it was the Modi government which nurtured and prevented it
"It was the result of Sardar Patel's foresight and his diplomatic and strategic ability that the unity and integrity of India could be ensured", Singh said
On being asked about the solution to the problem in Jammu and Kashmir, Malik said that their statehood should be returned with immediate effect
"The schemes implemented by the Union Government are now being seamlessly extended to the nook and corners of J & K"
The bench granted three days time to parties to file written notes on their submissions in the case
Lone is the lead petitioner challenging the abrogation of Article 370 that accorded special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir
"This should not happen. Someone arguing before this court gets suspended...," the SC bench had said
"The abrogation of the provision was not an executive decision and that the entirety of Parliament which included Members of Parliament (MPs) of Jammu and Kashmir had been taken into confidence
Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta said that the exact timeframe for the conduct of elections cannot be provided as there are repeated law and order disturbances in the Valley
This was while on the twelfth day of hearing petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, granting special status to Jammu and Kashmir
Article 35A, which was scrapped in August 2019, allowed the legislature of the erstwhile state to define "permanent residents" and provide them with special rights and privileges
A 5-judge bench headed by CJI DY Chandrachud was hearing a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 that accorded special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir
The Central government abrogated Article 370 granting special status to Jammu and Kashmir on August 5, 2019, and bifurcated the erstwhile state into Union territories of J and K, and Ladakh
"The present petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed," the top court said