Chattisgarh | 476 |
Goa | 161 |
Gujarat | 649 |
Karnataka | 621 |
Maharashtra | 2,209 |
Orissa | 464 |
Pondicherry (UT) | 79 |
Sikkim | 56 |
West Bengall | 713 |
Andhra Pradesh | 1,231 |
Punjab | 1,315 |
Source: Power Finance Corporation |
|
The very fact that subsidies are being released (in fact, subsidies are being deposited with the utilities upfront by state governments like Andhra, which dole out free power) is a good sign and we have to thank the discipline imposed by the electricity regulators for that. |
|
There have been periods when committed subsidies have not been disbursed, causing a back hole in the entire chain of generation, transmission and distribution. |
|
Though the data from the Power Finance Corporation (across 70 utilities) does not match that collated by the Planning Commission, which counts just a handful of states that are not incurring commercial losses, it does not refute the fact that some state utilities have seen a turnaround. |
|
The most dramatic turnaround has been in Gujarat, which shows a cash profit of Rs 649 crore in 2004-05 against a cash loss of Rs 343 crore last year. But more on that later. |
|
There are other positive signs too. The combined cash losses of all states have reduced sharply from Rs 18,918 crore in 2001-02 to Rs 3,438 crore last year (2004-05), after touching a low of Rs 2,268 in 2003-04. |
|
There is an improvement in profit/ reduction in losses across 36 utilities in 2004-05 (over the previous year) totalling Rs 2,718 crore, though this stands dwarfed by the deterioration in profits/ increase in losses in 29 utilities amounting to Rs 4,536 crore. |
|
Here is something more to digest. Return on capital employed was
|