Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

Google Play Store policies: CCI files caveat before Supreme Court

The NCLAT, on January 11, refused to stay the CCI order and asked Google to "cease and desist" from abusive Playstore practices

The NCLAT, on January 11, refused to stay the CCI order and asked Google to cease and desist from abusive practices in the Playstore
Bhavini Mishra New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jan 20 2023 | 9:53 PM IST
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) on Friday filed a caveat before Supreme Court to avert any relief to Google without informing the regulator, acting a day after the top court refused to grant an interim stay to the technology giant in a case related to Android devices.

The CCI’s caveat relates to its separate order that on October 25 imposed a fine of Rs 936.44 crore on Google for abusing its dominant position through its Play Store policies. Google had moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against this order. 

A caveat asks a court that certain actions should not be taken without informing the person (in this case CCI) who gave the notice.

The NCLAT, on January 11, refused to stay the CCI order and asked Google to "cease and desist" from abusive Playstore practices.

A two-member NCLAT Bench said Google’s appeal against the CCI order is subject to the tech giant depositing 10 per cent of the penalty imposed by the competition regulator. “Penalty to be deposited with the Registrar in four weeks. The matter is listed for a final hearing on April 17. No interim order," NCLAT said.

Google parent Alphabet’s lawyer Harish Salve had argued before the NCLAT that CCI’s order cites various examples of abuse by the tech giant without discussing their adverse effect on competition. “This goes against the Competition Act and case laws,” he said. 

If Google complies with the CCI order it would have to make deep changes in its policies (Play Store and third parties) and it may suffer loss of revenue, Salve added. 

Advocates Samar Bansal with Manu Chaturvedi, who argued for CCI, said that Google has admitted that it is implementing similar directions as contained in the regulator’s order in other jurisdictions such as Europe. “However, in India, Google/Alphabet has chosen to appeal and press for a stay of such directions which show discriminatory conduct of Google between India and other jurisdictions,” they said.

Play Store requires all app developers on the platform to only use Google Play’s Billing System (GPBS) to charge their customers. GPBS is also mandatory for in-app purchases.

After Google started charging a 30 percent commission in 2020 for Play Store transactions, some App developers complained to the CCI. 

Topics :GoogleCCISupreme CourtNCLAT

Next Story