Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

Dilip Pendse (1956-2017): Member of Tata group's innermost circle in 1990s

Police said the 61-year-old committed suicide, cited personal issues as reason in a note left behind

Dilip Pendse
Dilip Pendse
Dev Chatterjee Mumbai
Last Updated : Jul 06 2017 | 1:26 AM IST
Dilip Pendse, former managing director of Tata Finance, was on Wednesday found dead in his office in Dadar, Mumbai. He resided in the same building where his office was located. The police said the 61-year-old had committed suicide and had cited personal issues to be the reason in a note he left behind. 

Pendse was sacked from Tata Finance in mid-1990s by the Tata group on charges of manipulating some stocks in connivance with other Tata group entities and brokers.

For these alleged offences, in December 2012, 13 years after the original case was filed, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) banned Pendse from the capital market for two years. But this order was quashed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). 

During the 1990s, Pendse was a member of the innermost circle of the salt-to-steel Tata group led by the then chairman Ratan Tata. As per Sebi, in the late 1990s, Pendse allegedly routed money raised from Tata Finance’s deposit holders through two subsidiaries, Niskalp Investments and Inshallah Investments, to various new economy stocks such as Himachal Futuristic Communications, Global Telesystems, Veerangana Software, etc.

These stocks tumbled in the dot-com crash in 2000-2001, raising questions over the safety of depositors’ money. By April 2001, Sebi started its enquiries when Tata Finance wanted to raise Rs 90 crore through a rights issue. Sebi was initially verifying if the losses made in the above investments required a disclosure to the investors of the rights issue.

The Tata group first acknowledged these losses in July 2001, but distanced itself from Pendse’s actions. In a statement, Tata Finance’s board of directors said that certain unauthorised financial transactions were discovered by the board that “include, inter alia, diversion of funds to its subsidiary, Niskalp Investment and certain other associate companies, whose affairs were also controlled and managed by the then management of Tata Finance”. “The controversy now assumed larger proportions,” it said.

The Tatas hired AF Ferguson to do an independent audit of Tata Finance’s books. Losses were initially estimated to be Rs 125 crore. Eventually, Tatas alleged illegal diversions to Niskalp caused losses of Rs 425 crore. Tata Sons, the group holding company, took over Niskalp to protect the deposit holders of Tata Finance from potential losses.

Pendse claimed that all his investments were done with the approval of the group's top brass. He claimed as much in an affidavit filed in the Bombay High Court, where he said Tata and other senior group functionaries, such as N A Soonawala, were aware of the investments made by Tata Finance in Niskalp. Tata denied this.

At an annual general meeting of VSNL in August 2002, Tata said, “It is absolutely untrue that I was consulted by Pendse. I was not involved in Tata Finance and its issues. The first time I was informed was when Pendse called me up in Dubai on April 1. If I was involved, why would he contact me?" he had said.

People close to Pendse say he was the blue-eyed boy of the Tata group bosses till the controversy broke out. Pendse claimed in a newspaper interview that “Tata used to talk to me regularly and we used to discuss various matters, including matters of Tata Finance”.

He added that he used to meet Tata every Wednesday at 3 pm (whenever he was in town) to discuss group affairs and those meetings lasted 30-45 minutes. “This practice was followed after my taking over as the managing director of Tata Finance till almost the end of 1998 and early 1999. Thereafter, I continued to meet him frequently, though not on a specific day. I had meetings with him not only in his office but even at his house after office hours,” he was quoted as saying.

Pendse then challenged the Sebi order at the SAT. In April 2014, the SAT quashed the Sebi order and asked the regulator to pass a fresh order "on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six months".

Sebi then gave an opportunity of personal hearing to Pendse and in October 2014, it finally banned him for two years effective December 2012.

Next Story