Madras High Court today upheld the order of a single judge-bench restraining a Bangalore-based company from infringing Hinduja group flagship company Ashok Leyland's registered trademark "Luxura" by using an identical and deceptively similar trademark on their buses.
The court dismissed the appeal of Blue Hill Logistics that had challenged the December 21 order of a single judge-bench of Justice V Ramasubramanian.
Ramasubramanian passed the interim order after Ashok Leyland moved the court, seeking an injunction to restrain Blue Hill Logistics of Bangalore and Dilip Chhabria Design Private Ltd of Mumbai from infringing its trade mark.
Ashok Leyland had submitted that they had launched the Luxura bus in 2006 and sold it to many customers all over India, including Transport Corporations.
Blue Hill which launched bus services between Bengaluru and Chennai under the disputed trademark Luxuria using Volvo buses designed by Dilip Chaabria Design Private Ltd, contended Ashok Leyland cannot claim monopoly either over the word "LUXURY" or over the variants of that word.
It said the registered trade mark of the Ashok Leyland pertained to goods, while the trade mark adopted by it pertained to services and that there was neither prima facie case nor balance of convenience in favour of Ashok Leyland to grant injunction.
More From This Section
Dismissing the appeals, a division bench comprising Justice R Banumathi and Justice V Periyakarrupiah said, "Since the Plaintiff (Ashok Leyland) is the registered proprietor of the trade mark, its statutory right is to be protected. Once prima facie case of infringement of trade mark is established, normally an injunction must follow."
The bench said since the case of Ashok Leyland was not marginal, there was no doubt that Plaintiff would suffer, if the Blue Hills Logistics and Dilip Chhabria Design Private Ltd were not restrained from using the infringing mark "LUXURIA".
"On the other hand, if the defendants are restrained from using the mark "LUXURIA", Blue Hills Logistics may not lose the business," it said.
Having regard to the Plaintiff's exclusive right to use of the mark and weighing the various factors and also balance of convenience, the learned single Judge rightly granted temporary injunction, the bench held.
It also observed that Blue Hills Logistics has not made out any substantial ground for interference with the well considered order of the single Judge.