 "Kudankulam: Activists fire salvo at pollution control board")
As per the criteria, the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), in its report, had asked the Kundankulam Nuclear Power Project (KNPP) to increase the green belt by 25%.
“At present, they only have 6% of green belt. Moreover, the outfall of hot water should be discharged at least 1.5-2 km away from the sea shore through a pipeline, which is not there. In this case, the entire sea shore would get hot because of the treated sea water,” said Chennai-based environmental activist G Sundararajan, who has filed a petition against the clearance by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) for the project.
More From This Section
The case is likely to be taken up before the Madras High Court tomorrow.
M Pushpanarayan of the People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy (PMANE), which is in the forefront of the agitations, too echoed Sundararajan’s allegations.
The first unit of 2x1000 mega watt Koodankulam plant achieved criticality last week and is expected to start power production in a couple of weeks.
In its report, the pollution control board also asked for computerization of the temperature record system at the final outlet of condenser cooling and get it connected to CARE AIR Centre in Chennai. It also asked for a separate water meter for industrial cooling purpose among its suggestions.
When contacted, Jayakumar T C Ethiraju, Joint Chief Environmental Engineer of TNPCB said, “We are only looking into air and water quality aspects related to the project. As of now, the project has complied with all the facilities as per our criteria. They have an effluent treatment plant and also a storage waste water handling facility in place.”
Regarding the First Approach to Criticality (FAC) of Unit-1 of the project, AERB chairman S S Bajaj told Business Standard the plant meets all the criteria required as of now in the environmental and safety side.