The state is also in the process of sending demand notices of Rs 45 billion to some of the large chrome ore miners including Tata Steel, Jindal Stainless, Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys (IMFA) and state Odisha Mining Corporation (OMC) for similar violations.
This follows Odisha government's decision to extend the scope of the Supreme Court order on illegal iron ore and manganese mining in the state, in which the Apex court had interpreted the section 21 (5) of the mines and mineral development and regulation (MMDR) Act differently.
Whereas illegal mining under relevant section of the Act was earlier perceived to be mining outside the leasehold area, the August 2, 2017 order of the court inferred that raising of ore without the requisite support of environment and forest clearances (FC) would also be considered as illegal mining.
Hence, the court asked the state government to recover the amount equivalent to the price of mineral so raised as compensation. The period for which the irregularities were taken into account was from 2000-01 to 2010-11.
Though the court order came while disposing of a case relating to illegal mining of iron ore and manganese in Odisha, the state government has decided to expand the scope of the judgement to other minerals like coal, chromite, bauxite and lime stone as the court in general has given a new interpretation to the section 21 (5) of the MMDR Act which governs mining of all major minerals.
So, after collecting more than Rs 117 billion compensation from the errant iron ore and manganese miners who had excavated beyond their EC and FC sanctions, the state government has focused its attention on similar violations in other minerals.
In response to the show cause notice from the Odisha government preceding the demand notice, Coal India subsidiary MCL had stated that the ramification of the Supreme Court judgement should not be applicable to them as it pertained to iron ore and manganese leases. Besides, they argued that they being guided by Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, the changes in interpretation of section 21 (5) of MMDR Act should no way affect them.
However, the state government has rejected the MCL plea saying the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act is applicable only for acquisition of land for coal excavation, while the mining activity is governed by MMDR Act.
Meanwhile, the state is working out the compensation demand for EC violations by some of the leading chromite miners. The amount is estimated at about Rs 45 billion. The errant companies include state-owned Odisha Mining Corporation (Rs 16.6 billion), Tata Steel (Rs 15.75 billion), Jindal Stainless (Rs 1.26 billion), IMFA (Rs1.4 billion), Balasore Alloys (Rs 3 billion), FACOR (Rs 2.01 billion), IDCOL (Rs 3.37 billion), Misrilal (RS 0.42 billion), B C Mohanty (Rs 1.22 billion). The demand notices will be sent to them soon, said the sources.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe To BS Premium
₹249
Renews automatically
₹1699₹1999
Opt for auto renewal and save Rs. 300 Renews automatically
₹1999
What you get on BS Premium?
- Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
- Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
- Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
- Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
- Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in