Without such certification, operators cannot give firm orders to vendors (they do not know whether it will be a “trusted category” and ready for use or not) and the telecom gear maker can neither import nor manufacture the equipment, which in any case will require many weeks’ lead time. This move, they say, could jeopardise their plans in the country.
The government launched the “Trusted Telecom Portal” on June 15 and telecom gear makers said they had given the details required on the sources and origins of the products. But nearly 10 weeks are about to elapse and there has been no response. Telecom gear makers have already approached the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and have asked telcos on whose behalf they are taking the security clearance in pushing the government.
“We see a loss of more than six months for the equipment to be made available to telcos. This will only delay the digitisation process of the country. It is a complete reversal of ease of doing business,” said a senior executive of a global telecom gear maker.
Companies like Huawei have put in applications and are in the process of asking for clearance for some of their 5G equipment, according to sources. Huawei, however, declined to comment on the issue.
The company’s position is that the rules do not stop it from participating in the telecom gear market in the country, say sources.
The National Security Directive for Telecom has made it mandatory for providers to get the “trusted” tag on all telecom equipment that telcos want to buy from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Experts say it has been made in order to put in restrictions on Chinese telecom equipment, but they stop short of a complete ban as some countries have openly done.
The National Security Committee of Telecom, headed by the deputy national security advisor, will decide whom to give the tag.
The move came after the US prodded its global allies to stop buying Chinese telecom gear because such equipment is allegedly used for spying, which Huawei has denied. Countries like the UK, Japan, and Australia have put in severe restrictions on Chinese telecom gear.
As a result, Indian OEMs have to divulge a lot of detail, which includes information on the product, the organisation, its top 10 shareholders up to three levels, the country of origin, or whether there has been any change of ownership. Details on active components, their makers, the location of their global headquarters, and even the country where the intellectual property rights reside have to be given.
In the case of software, the global headquarters of the owner, that of the sub-contractors and from which country it will be upgraded need to be stated.
Telecom gear makers are uncertain about the percentage of Chinese components that would qualify for “trusted” certification.
“Most global telecom gear equipment makers that are not Chinese have a chunk of components made in China, or some are even built there. Will a US chip made in China be considered American or Chinese?” asked an executive of a European telco. He pointed out the exercise was complex and an easier way would have been to blacklist China as the US had done.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe To BS Premium
₹249
Renews automatically
₹1699₹1999
Opt for auto renewal and save Rs. 300 Renews automatically
₹1999
What you get on BS Premium?
- Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
- Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
- Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
- Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
- Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in