 "Art of Living event controversy: Army opposed building bridges for Sri Sri's 'private function'")
The army conveyed in writing to the defence ministry its reservations against building six bridges for the World Cultural Festival (WCF) organised by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's Art of Living (AOL) Foundation from March 11-13. The army regarded WCF as "a private function".
Yet the defence ministry overruled the army's written representation, ordering first one, and then two, bridges to be constructed over the Yamuna, for what it regarded as a "public function."
Business Standard has accessed the army's letter to the defence ministry, written in the third week of February, conveying the personal decision of the army chief. The letter cited three arguments why operational army bridges should not be used for a private event.
The army's first objection was that the bridging equipment was stored across various army cantonments. Transporting these to Delhi would req-uire a major logistical effort and expense. The second reason was that these bridges co-mprised valuable operational equipment, which had a finite service life in terms of the number of times they could be launched. The army argued that this limited service life should be safeguarded for war. The third reason was the impropriety of deploying military troops for what it considered a private function.
Overruling these objections, the defence ministry explicitly took the view that WCF was a public function. It conveyed to the army that a private function was one "organised by a private individual, for private purposes, in private premises."
It told the army that, where large public attendance was expected for a function that the government had cleared, it would have to take responsibility for public safety, traffic control, crowd control, etc.
With the defence ministry effectively overruling the army's objections, the generals say they took on the job whole-heartedly "in the spirit with which it built bridges for the Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, and organised the annual Amarnath Yatra".
An engineer regiment from Meerut was moved to build and maintain the bridges, while equipment was transported from a large number of cantonments.
The "Regulations for the Army" lays down rules for "Employment of troops on duties in aid of civil authorities". According to Paragraph 301, troops may be called in for "maintenance of law and order; maintenance of essential services; assistance during natural calamities such as earthquakes and floods; and any other type of assistance which may be needed by the civil authorities."
In overruling the army's written objections, the defence ministry relied on the fourth clause: "any other type of assistance which may be needed by the civil authorities."
Army generals say the Delhi and Uttar Pradesh governments had jointly cleared WCF, while the Delhi government had requested for bridges. The decision to overrule army reservations to building bridges, however, was taken by the defence ministry.
Yet the defence ministry overruled the army's written representation, ordering first one, and then two, bridges to be constructed over the Yamuna, for what it regarded as a "public function."
Read more from our special coverage on "ART OF LIVING"
- Art of Living event controversy: Damage extent was known before the event
- Yamuna farmers unhappy with compensation from Art of Living
- Heres why Arvind Kejriwal is cosying up to pujya guruji Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
- Sri Sri Ravi Shankar calls for peace and harmony as festival takes off
- Heavy downpour at Art of Livings cultural festival
Business Standard has accessed the army's letter to the defence ministry, written in the third week of February, conveying the personal decision of the army chief. The letter cited three arguments why operational army bridges should not be used for a private event.
The army's first objection was that the bridging equipment was stored across various army cantonments. Transporting these to Delhi would req-uire a major logistical effort and expense. The second reason was that these bridges co-mprised valuable operational equipment, which had a finite service life in terms of the number of times they could be launched. The army argued that this limited service life should be safeguarded for war. The third reason was the impropriety of deploying military troops for what it considered a private function.
Overruling these objections, the defence ministry explicitly took the view that WCF was a public function. It conveyed to the army that a private function was one "organised by a private individual, for private purposes, in private premises."
It told the army that, where large public attendance was expected for a function that the government had cleared, it would have to take responsibility for public safety, traffic control, crowd control, etc.
With the defence ministry effectively overruling the army's objections, the generals say they took on the job whole-heartedly "in the spirit with which it built bridges for the Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, and organised the annual Amarnath Yatra".
An engineer regiment from Meerut was moved to build and maintain the bridges, while equipment was transported from a large number of cantonments.
The "Regulations for the Army" lays down rules for "Employment of troops on duties in aid of civil authorities". According to Paragraph 301, troops may be called in for "maintenance of law and order; maintenance of essential services; assistance during natural calamities such as earthquakes and floods; and any other type of assistance which may be needed by the civil authorities."
In overruling the army's written objections, the defence ministry relied on the fourth clause: "any other type of assistance which may be needed by the civil authorities."
Army generals say the Delhi and Uttar Pradesh governments had jointly cleared WCF, while the Delhi government had requested for bridges. The decision to overrule army reservations to building bridges, however, was taken by the defence ministry.