Jolted by that arrest, India's ministry of defence (MoD) had unilaterally suspended the €556-million (Rs 4,480-crore) helicopter contract with Finmeccanica subsidiary, AgustaWestland. It was formally terminated on New Year's day.
Now, with the Italian probe closed, the MoD must rely on an on-going investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that has shown little progress so far.
After the MoD handed over the case to the CBI, the agency took just days to file a First Information Report (FIR) against former IAF boss, Air Chief Marshal S P Tyagi, and 12 others, alleging cheating and criminal conspiracy. The accused denied all charges against them.
Since that initial FIR in March 2013, the CBI has filed no further reports or even a chargesheet. It has interviewed Tyagi once, as well as three former civil servants who later became state governors - former national security advisor M K Narayanan; former Special Protection Group (SPG) chief B V Wanchoo; and former Intelligence Bureau chief ESL Narasimhan.
CBI is determined to pursue its investigation, though it has relied heavily on investigations by Italian prosecutors. "It is a complicated case; but our investigations are at an advanced stage," insists CBI spokesperson Kanchan Prasad.
Off-the-record, MoD officials claim "clear evidence" that AgustaWestland violated an "integrity clause" in the contract, which prohibits the employment of middlemen or agents to facilitate the deal. The Italian investigation centred on three alleged middlemen - Guido Haschke, Christian Michel and Carlo Gerosa - who allegedly bribed key Indian decision-makers.
The latest developments were promulgated on the Finmeccanica website on Tuesday evening, which stated: "Finmeccanica announces that the Italian Prosecutor has discontinued investigations relating to the contract for 12 AW101 VVIP helicopters signed with the Indian Ministry of Defence in 2010."
The statement admitted that Finmeccanica would pay a "negligible fine", but this was "not in any way an admission of any wrongdoing or liability" by the company.
As part of the arrangement, says Finmeccanica, "The (Italian) Prosecutor specifically acknowledged the non-involvement of Finmeccanica in the alleged wrongdoing, recognizing that that since 2003, Finmeccanica has implemented - and regularly updated - an organizational, management and audit model, sufficient to prevent unlawful conduct, whilst ensuring that significant attention is given to compliance processes in order to uphold the adequate standards of ethics and appropriate conduct."
Since the contract was suspended, the MoD and AgustaWestland have remained in a standoff, with three VVIP helicopters having already been delivered to India, and several more ready for delivery. The MoD has encashed bank guarantees worth about Rs 2,200 crore that had been provided by AgustaWestland.
Yet, the Italian helicopter giant has signalled that it would confront India's MoD legally to protect its reputation. On Oct 4, 2013, AgustaWestland invoked arbitration under the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The MoD stated on Nov 26 that it would not accept arbitration, but then nominated an arbitrator on Jan 1, when it terminated the contract. A third, neutral, arbitrator must be appointed by mutual consent.
At the heart of the allegations against AgustaWestland was a change in specifications that allowed the AW-101 to be eligible for purchase. The IAF's first tender (in 2002) demanded a helicopter that could operate at altitudes of up to 6000 metres. After just one helicopter qualified (the EC-225 Eurocopter) the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government began a process of reconsideration in Nov 2003 that eventually led to another tender in Sept 2006, which diluted the requirement to 4500 metres.
A MoD fact sheet, issued on Feb 15, 2013, points out that the decision involved both the NDA and the UPA governments, and two IAF chiefs --- including Air Chief Marshal S Krishnaswamy who preceded Tyagi.
The fact sheet says: "The procurement case was, thus, progressed in accordance with the established procurement procedure in a transparent manner with all stages of procurement being followed meticulously."
It remains unclear then what violation the CBI investigation seeks to unearth.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹810
1 Year
₹67/Month
Super Saver
₹1,170
2 Years
₹48/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories
Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app