Bengaluru-based green Environmental Support Group (ESG) has demanded that the Centre redo the exercise and rework the High Powered Committee Report on ‘Reform of Environmental Laws’, yet again.
ESG has charged that the terms of reference are not clear and confound more than clarify, and should involve an inter-disciplinary committee consisting of women and men, experienced and expert members, and drawn from various geographies, supported by a democratic process and with sufficient time and space for public consultations nation-wide. It has added that the outcome would be recalled as a monumental effort that not only secured national interest, but also that of a world precariously edging towards runaway climate change induced impacts.
The High Level Committee, headed by former Union Cabinet Secretary T S R Subramanian, was set up by the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change on August 29, 2014. The complex exercise of review of laws and judgements, and governance practices, followed by the formulation and presentation of a report with recommendations for amendments to existing laws, was to be completed within two months.
The committee was given a mandate to review all laws and judgements pertaining to the environment, wildlife and forest protection, and also those relating to pollution control, and then produce a report with specific recommendations for reforms in law and governance.
In its critique, the NGO said, “The exercise has been undertaken in a hurried manner, without sufficient inquiry into the relevant factors, without addressing the concerns of a range of communities, and especially those which are indigenous and natural resource dependent; and without considering the importance of consulting elected representatives from local government, legislatures and the Parliament.”
The report, hence, is not a comprehensively democratic effort, and promotes a scheme for environmental reforms, ESG charged. If adopted, it could result in widespread chaos in environmental governance and jurisprudence, and also cause irreversible damage to the environment, cause widespread loss of natural ecosystems and could further fuel fundamental violation of human rights in a country where discontents over environmental decisions have become increasingly contentious, it said.
ESG has charged that the terms of reference are not clear and confound more than clarify, and should involve an inter-disciplinary committee consisting of women and men, experienced and expert members, and drawn from various geographies, supported by a democratic process and with sufficient time and space for public consultations nation-wide. It has added that the outcome would be recalled as a monumental effort that not only secured national interest, but also that of a world precariously edging towards runaway climate change induced impacts.
The High Level Committee, headed by former Union Cabinet Secretary T S R Subramanian, was set up by the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change on August 29, 2014. The complex exercise of review of laws and judgements, and governance practices, followed by the formulation and presentation of a report with recommendations for amendments to existing laws, was to be completed within two months.
The committee was given a mandate to review all laws and judgements pertaining to the environment, wildlife and forest protection, and also those relating to pollution control, and then produce a report with specific recommendations for reforms in law and governance.
In its critique, the NGO said, “The exercise has been undertaken in a hurried manner, without sufficient inquiry into the relevant factors, without addressing the concerns of a range of communities, and especially those which are indigenous and natural resource dependent; and without considering the importance of consulting elected representatives from local government, legislatures and the Parliament.”
The report, hence, is not a comprehensively democratic effort, and promotes a scheme for environmental reforms, ESG charged. If adopted, it could result in widespread chaos in environmental governance and jurisprudence, and also cause irreversible damage to the environment, cause widespread loss of natural ecosystems and could further fuel fundamental violation of human rights in a country where discontents over environmental decisions have become increasingly contentious, it said.
You’ve reached your limit of 5 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
SAVE 25%
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
SAVE 46%
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Subscribe
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories
Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors
Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share
Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor
Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements
Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
SAVE 25%