The Union finance ministry’s Economic Survey of financial year 2009-10 outlines a new agenda for economic and governance reform to create, as the Survey says, “an enabling government.”
In a bold assertion of independent thinking on second generation reforms, the Survey calls for greater flexibility in the labour market, aimed at “creating market conditions that result in greater demand for labour.” The Survey also calls for a reduction of petroleum and fertiliser subsidies and investment in agricultural research and higher education aimed at increasing land and human productivity. The Survey also recommends bringing down peak Customs tariff from 10 per cent to 7.5 per cent.
Expressing concern about food price inflation, the Survey seeks a new “standard operating procedure” (SOP) for the “kind of actions that the state ought to take in the event of a skewed price rise in the food sector”. In a clear admission of the government’s lack of preparedness for the current financial year’s inflationary spiral, the Survey dubs it a new price phenomenon restricted to a few commodities and coins the phrase “skewflation” to describe it.
Enthused by the growth prospects, the Survey, on the first page of the first chapter, suggests that the time is ripe for starting a withdrawal of the stimulus measures, albeit gradually. Giving credit to the government for the economic recovery, it says: “…the broad-based nature of the recovery creates scope for a gradual rollback, in due course, of some of the measures undertaken over the last 15 to 18 months, as part of the policy response to the global slowdown…”
More From This Section
The Survey conveys the finance ministry’s concerns about the fiscal situation. Drawing attention to the views of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, the Survey underlines the importance of reducing the fiscal deficit and the overall debt of the government.
Setting out what the Survey terms as “the micro-foundations of inclusive growth” it says the key challenge before the country is to make the government do more but interfere less.
“An enabling state” says the Survey, “takes the view that, when in doubt, do not interfere. … the default option of an enabling state is to allow rather than stop, to permit instead of prevent.”
This altered conception of the state, says the Survey, can have dramatic effect on the functioning of an economy, in general by promoting greater efficiency and higher productivity. In an aside, the Survey is critical of the ban on futures trading, stating “the Government should, ideally, desist from imposing an outright ban on futures trade and, instead, provide it with a regulatory structure to promote transparency and to discourage collusion.”