The finance ministry has favoured a 50:50 budgetary support-sharing formula between the Centre and the states, as against the present norm of 75:25, for centrally sponsored schemes. |
"Pending a settlement of the outstanding issue of transfer of centrally sponsored schemes, it should be considered that all Central budgetary interventions require matching Budgetary intervention from the states on a uniform 50:50 norm for the next Plan," the finance ministry commented on the Planning Commission's approach paper for the 11th Plan. |
|
The suggestion is significant in the face of a demand by certain special-category states like Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and those in the north-east to reduce their contribution to 10 per cent. |
|
"If the equal-sharing formula of the ministry is adopted, there is a possibility that the fiscal deficit of the states may go up and affect the state gross domestic product," a Planning Commission official said. |
|
Making a case for the transfer of all centrally sponsored schemes to states barring those in national priority areas, the finance ministry said there was a distinct possibility of the Centre over-extending itself by taking on responsibility for an increasingly larger set of objectives and goals, most of which lay squarely in the domain of local bodies and state governments. |
|
It said the approach paper should emphasise the "primacy of the role of the state governments, instead of placing the burden on the Centre." |
|
This, it said, was necessary for balanced regional development and accelerating growth in backward states like Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, and Uttar Pradesh. |
|
In this context, there was a need to review reform-linked incentive programmes since the experience with schemes like the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission and the Accelerated Power Reforms Development Programme had not been satisfactory. |
|
|
|