The government has ruled that Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd (IPCL) will not have to pay marketing margin on the gas it buys from GAIL ( India). The order comes after GAIL threatened to discontinue supply until marketing margins were paid. |
In response, IPCL had approached the petroleum ministry, saying GAIL was unjustified in demanding marketing margin. |
|
GAIL was of the view that only those consumers qualifying to be under the administered-price mechanism (power and fertiliser sector) were exempt from the levy. GAIL's argument was that IPCL was paying a market-determined price to other suppliers, while GAIL had to continue charging the administered price. |
|
The ministry, after examining the issue, said the original gas pricing order of June 2006 did not envisage charging of a marketing margin to any category of consumers. The ministry communication to GAIL said no margin above the transportation tariff could be charged. |
|
The gas pricing order of 2005 had only envisaged a dual pricing regime, where consumers in the power and the fertiliser sectors and small consumers would be subject to an administered price of Rs 3,200 per million cubic metres. |
|
"In addition, GAIL did not engage in any new marketing efforts since June vis-a-vis any of these consumers. Moreover, GAIL performs transportation and distribution of gas as a bundled activity," the ministry said. |
|
Gail had asked IPCL to pay a marketing margin of Rs 222 per thousand cubic meters on the administered price, which it was supplying to IPCL's plants at Baroda, Gandhar (Gujarat) and Nagathone (Maharashtra). |
|
Gail had last month said, "IPCL has not signed the revised gas supply agreement after the government pricing order which came into effect from July 1, 2005". |
|
|
|