The stand-off between the state government and Lokayukta Justice N Santosh Hegde over the legality of ordering a judicial probe into the land scams showed no signs of abating today with the Ombudsman questioning the former’s contention.
The government earlier this month ordered a judicial probe into land scams after a spirited opposition attack on Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa regarding the alleged illegal allotments and denotification of land. Justice Hegde held the view the probe cannot be held as the Lokayukta is already probing some scams under the judicial commission for enquiry and the government has not taken his permission as required under certain provisions of the Lokayukta Act before issuing the notification.
The state’s Advocate General had yesterday expressed the view that government is within its jurisdiction in ordering a judicial inquiry as the step was taken before the JD(S) had leaders lodged a complaint with the Lokayukta, levelling allegations against the Chief Minister. He contended that while the government took a decision on November 18 to order a judicial inquiry, JD(S) lodged complaint with Lokayukta on the same day.
But the Lokayukta approved the investigation only on November 23 and sent notices to the Chief Minister on the next day. The government, by then, had issued the orders constituting the judicial commission. Justice Hegde said here that the government notified the judicial probe only on November 23, and added that its “personal discussions” and “expressing view to the media” earlier (that it would order a judicial probe) does not become a Government Order.
He said the complaint was registered on November 18, it was numbered and allotted to a judicial officer. “From the time it’s registered, the investigation starts,” he said. “It’s different steps in the process of investigation. The investigation started on November 18,” Justice Hegde said, adding preliminary enquiry began on November 20 and he approved the enquiry on November 23.
Asked if he would grant permission to the government to order a judicial probe if his nod was sought, he said if the government deletes certain “references” (for investigation in the probe) which are already being probed by the Lokayukta, he is ready to do so.
“Follow the rule. Don’t demean the (Lokayukta) institution... I am protecting my institution’s integrity. I am not trying to drag something which is not mine,” Justice Hegde said.
He said the government has not taken his prior approval before ordering the judicial probe. “They have not consulted me. Therefore, this (judicial probe) cannot be done.”