Gujarat is now the country’s ninth fastest growing among states and Union Territories (UT), behind Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Uttarakhand, Tripura, Goa, Kerala and Odisha. The state’s rank improves to seventh if average growth for the past five years is taken into account. The analysis excludes smaller states and UTs such as Sikkim, Mizoram, Puducherry, Manipur and Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
Experts attribute Gujarat’s relative underperformance to its larger base, among other factors. In FY13, Gujarat had the fifth largest economy (Rs 4.27 lakh crore) among all states, behind Maharashtra (Rs 8.44 lakh crore), Tamil Nadu (Rs 4.51 lakh crore), Uttar Pradesh (Rs 4.45 lakh crore) and Andhra Pradesh (Rs 4.42 lakh crore). In per capita terms, Gujarat is the eighth richest behind Goa, Delhi, Chandigarh, Puducherry, Sikkim, Maharashtra and Haryana, according to data from the Central Statistics Office (CSO).
“The industrial slowdown in India has affected Gujarat’s performance. But it still grew faster than the all-India average. The smaller states (in terms of the size of the economy) are better off due to their low base, but would need to put in a lot of effort through affirmative policy action and expenditure by the government to scale up the process once a critical size is reached. That will be the challenge going ahead,” says D R Dogra, managing director of CARE Ratings. The industrial slowdown has impacted economic growth in industrialised states, including Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, he says.
Andhra Pradesh topped the chart with 21.1 per cent CAGR growth in rural MPCE, followed by Haryana (20.4 per cent), Tamil Nadu (19.4 per cent) and Rajasthan (18.8 per cent). Gujarat’s urban MPCE growth at 15.1 per cent also lags the all-India urban MPCE growth of 15.6 per cent during the period, according to survey data from the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO).
The report was rejected by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) The two other states whose development models the BJP is trying to cash in on — Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh — were also kept in the bracket of least developed states. Keeping company were Bihar, Odisha, Jharkhand, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, UP and Rajasthan.
The new index, proposed by the Rajan committee, is based on averages of 10 sub-components — monthly per-capita consumption expenditure, education, health, household amenities, poverty rate, female literacy, share of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the total population, urbanisation rate, financial inclusion, and connectivity.