HC upholds stricter tax rule on inflow from abroad

Allows govt to impose 30% tax deduction at source on inflow from Cyprus

India trails in taxes, govt spending
T E NarasimhanGireesh Babu Chennai
Last Updated : Apr 13 2016 | 1:11 AM IST
The high court here has agreed with the Indian government’s 2013 plan to tax investments from Cyprus, which was used by several foreign investors to avoid taxes in India. The order would impact several foreign institutional investors (FIIs) and private equity investors which invested in India via the Cyprus route.

This clears the way for the government’s decision to impose a 30 per cent tax deduction at source on inflow from Cyprus, a setback for foreign institutional investors. The notification was dated November 2013. Tuesday's court order was from a bench of judges V Ramasubramanian and T Mathivanan.

According to market sources, between 2000 and 2014, inflow via Cyprus into India and Indian stock markets was Rs  38,300 crore.

Pramod Kumar Chopda, standing counsel for the Union ministry of finance, Central Board of Direct Taxes and the I-T department, said the order would be a  major step towards controlling undisclosed money.

“Section 94A," said the judges, was "the need of the hour" and suffered no unconstitutionality. It allows the Centre, when there's lack of effective exchange of information with any place outside India, to specify the said country or territory as a notified jurisdictional area for transactions by any assessee.

India and Cyprus did sign an agreement for avoidance of double taxation of income and prevention of fiscal evasion, in force since December 1994. Both agreed to exchange information in this regard, particular for prevention of fraud or evasion of taxes, said the finance ministry in November 2013, when the notification was issued. However, Cyprus had not been providing the information requested under the Agreement. So, it was decided to make Cyprus a notified jurisdictional area.

Three individuals had challenged the section's constitutional validity and the November 2013 notification. There was an October 2014 agreement between an Indian company incorporated in Cyprus and these three individuals, on sales of shares and debentures. Three months after, the petitioners got tax showcause notices. The legal case followed.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 13 2016 | 12:32 AM IST

Next Story