Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.
Home / Economy / News / Homebuyers as financial creditors; President okays amendments in IBC
Homebuyers as financial creditors; President okays amendments in IBC
Also, section 29 (A), inserted in the Code to debar defaulting promoters and related parties, would be relaxed for financial creditors who have acquired defaulting firms and MSMEs
Also, section 29 (A), inserted in the Code to debar defaulting promoters and related parties, would be relaxed for financial creditors who have acquired defaulting firms and medium and small enterprises.
Earlier, section 29 (A) was added to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to debar defaulting promoters with bad debts for over a year till the time a case for insolvency was admitted by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), besides their related parties.
After various stakeholders complained about the wide scope of this clause, it is being diluted for certain sections now on the recommendations of a panel, headed by corporate affairs secretary Injeti Srinivas.
While pure financial firms will be allowed to take part in the resolution process of the companies going under insolvency process, companies that have acquired defaulting firms would be allowed to do so for three years from the date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT.
The Srinivas panel had recommended that pure play financial entities must be exempt from the disqualification under the clause (c) of section 29A of the Code which debars persons who have an NPA account or are related parties from being resolution applicants.
The panel recommended that the term 'financial entities' may be defined in the Code to clarify the scope of
the exemption.
The Committee also agreed that this exemption must not be applicable to financial entities if they are related parties of the promoters of defaulting companies.
Earlier, it complained to the committee that given the nature of business undertaken by ARCs, scheduled banks , alternate investment funds, overseas financial institutions, and entities such as investment vehicles, foreign portfolio investors and foreign venture capital investors are likely to be related to companies and hence would be disqualified under section 29A.
The committee also suggested that a proviso must be added to section 29A(c) to state that if an NPA account is held
only because of acquisition of a company going under insolvency, the disqualification under that section will not be applicable.
The section 29 (A) is also being diluted for medium and small scale enterprises where promoters are generally bidders for the insolvent companies. Only wilful defaulters having bad debts for over a year would be disqualified from bidding.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month