The ratio saw a marked difference across states. While Chhattisgarh reported the highest ratio of 970, Haryana recorded the lowest (864).
Among rural areas, the highest was in Chhattisgarh (977) and the lowest in Punjab (861). For urban areas, the ratio varied from 983 in Kerala to 854 in Jharkhand.
Writing in The Indian Express, economist Surjit Bhalla and sociologist Ravinder Kaur had argued the emerging middle class (which had a propensity to screen the gender of an unborn child), as proportion of the overall population, was declining. As such, the two had said, the sex ratio should actually improve, as largely, the 'mature middle class' didn't determine the sex of foetuses.
The fall in the child sex ratio (for those aged up to four) - from 914 in 2009-11 to 909 in 2011-13 - presents a concern. In rural areas, this ratio stood at 911, while in urban areas, it was 902. At the state level, the ratio was the highest in Chhattisgarh (1,004); the lowest was in Haryana and Punjab. Experts said the deterioration in the child sex ratio was due to a combination of nutritional neglect and preference for the male child, which led to fewer resources being spent on the medical care of young girls.