| The petition filed by UP-based advocate and president of the Hindu Personal Law Board, Ashok Pandey, claimed that under the Constitutional provisions an MP has to resign his seat before getting elected to the state legislature. |
| The petitioner urged the court to issue a "quo warranto" (court's direction to a particular authority to explain under what authority he/she was discharging such powers) to the chief minister and the minister. |
| In the case of Mayawati and Mishra, it was submitted the two were sitting Rajya Sabha members and hence stood disqualified from being the chief minister and minister at the state level. |
| Quoting Article 164 (4) of the Constitution, the petition stated that even a non-member of the Legislative Assembly can be appointed as a minister, provided he/she gets elected to the Assembly within a six months period from the date of appointment. But Pandey claimed that there was no provision in the Constitution for an MP to be appointed as CM or minister in the state, as such a member has to resign his/her Parliamentary seat to contest the elections for the Assembly. |
| According to the petition, the case of Mayawati was not an isolated one, as all political parties were indulging in such "unconstitutional" practice by projecting certain sitting MPs as their prospective chief ministers without asking them to resign the Parliament seats. |
| The petition further noted that it would be unconstitutional for an MP not to resign before being elected as chief minister as otherwise he/she would be getting dual pay, perks and other benefits available to the two posts. |
| It recalled that in 2004, two ministers "" Paras Nath Yadav and Reoti Raman Singh resigned from the Mulayam Singh government after a writ petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court challenging their continuance in the ministry as they were already sitting MPs. |
| However, the petition was yet to be disposed of till date, Pandey submitted. |
Top Section
Explore Business Standard