The Indian Society of nephrology (ISN) has called for a strict government action against the kidney racket operating in the country. |
The government needs to amend the transplantation of human organ act ,1994 at the earliest stop it. |
|
According to KS Chugh, founder, ISN, rising incidence of chronic kidney diseases led to blossoming of middlemen involved in the business of kidney transplantation. |
|
Recent study conducted in Bhopal estimated that of the 1,52,000 kidney patients in India, only 20 per cent of could get transplantation organs from cadaver donors. |
|
Chugh alleged in some smaller cities near Delhi, kidney transplantation was being done at residences, while the act allowed organ transplantation only in "authorised" hospitals. |
|
"A new trend illegal kidney transplantation at residences is emerging in the northern part of the country , as it is a very lucrative business," he said. |
|
The transplantation act of 1994 stipulated that only near relatives of a kidney patient could donate organs. |
|
However, unrelated donors could give organs out of generosity, but without any monetary transaction. |
|
The society wanted the act to be amended do as to widen the organ pool by giving distant relatives the status of a rightful donor. |
|
At the same time it should encourage use of organs form cadaver donors. |
|
Three years ago the Delhi High Court had constituted a committee to look into the matter, but there was no progress, Chugh alleged. |
|
Kolkata had its own middlemen involved in illegal kidney transplantation. |
|
According to Dilip Kumar Pahari, secretary, ISN east, touts in Kolkata usually contacted patients on seeing advertisements by patients without a relative to donate a kidney. |
|
Touts posed as sympathetic donors but charged a huge fee from the patient for the kidney. |
|
Government support and insurance cover was also needed, Chugh said. |
|
Nearly 80 per cent of dialysis patients in India discontinued the procedure after a few months owing to economic problems. |
|
|
|