"The Committee observe that the Ministry (coal) deallocated some of the coal blocks only recently after the receipt of CAG Report in the matter. The ministry, however chose to sleep over this controversial issue rather than acting on their own.
"The Committee are of the firm opinion that this lackadaisical approach of the monitoring committee has led to delay in development of coal blocks and loss to the state exchequer," the Standing Committee on Coal and Steel said in its report tabled in Parliament yesterday.
Also Read
The IMG had last year reviewed 58 coal blocks which were issued notices for not developing them within stipulated time frame.
The Parliamentary panel also said in its report that even though the system of submission of BG was introduced in 2005, no BG was deducted from the defaulter allocatees.
"Though system of submission of bank guarantee by the private sector allocatees was introduced from 2005...No bank guarantee was deducted from the defaulter allocatees.
"It is only now, the IMG who has taken up the review of the 58 cases referred to it...Has recommended the deduction of bank guarantees," it said.
Under the system of bank guarantee submission, 50 per cent of the BG is linked to the milestones (time schedule) set for development of captive block, and the remaining 50 per cent to the guaranteed production.
"This clearly indicates that the monitoring committee has failed to take action against the defaulter companies since 2005," the committee said.
"Even the loss of royalty to the exchequer due to delay in achieving milestones (time schedule) set for development of captive block as well as the rated yearly production level as per the approved mine plan which was required to be deducted from bank guarantee was never recovered," it added.