Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

Wen critical of Indian media

Image
Press Trust Of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 6:57 AM IST

Faced with negative headlines on the outcome of his talks with the Indian leadership, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao was today sharply critical of the Indian media, saying it was causing “damage” to the bilateral ties.

Winding up his three-day visit here, Wen told a group of editors and scholars before emplaning for Pakistan that he understood the press in India had freedom, but it should play a role in promoting friendship.

Citing the Indian media’s coverage of the situation on the Sino-Indian border, the Chinese leader said “not a single shot had been fired” nor had there been any “exchanges in border areas” between the troops. Still, the boundary question had “repeatedly been sensationalised” by the media after which leaders of the two countries were forced to “repair the damage and harm”, he said.

His advice to the media was that it should play a more active role in enhancing friendship. “A good neighbour is a blessing. We must be good neighbours,” Wen emphasised.

Wen’s talks with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh yesterday resulted in a negative press with the media pointing out that India’s key concerns on stapled visas to the people from Jammu and Kashmir, terrorism emanating from Pakistan and its aspirations to be a permanent member of the UN Security Council had not been addressed.

Wen said that in his eight years as Premier, he had given only one interview to a departing foreign journalist, who was from India (PTI).

Answering questions, the Chinese Premier said it was undeniable that in the long history between the two countries there was “a page of twists and turns”, an apparent reference to the 1962 Sino-Indian war.

More From This Section

But that was a “short page” and it was time the two countries “turned over that page”, he emphasised.

Both India and China had gone through “a lot of history” and surmounted “a lot of difficulties”. Both had great ethnic, cultural and religious diversities and therefore both have to be “inclusive societies”.

Also Read

First Published: Dec 18 2010 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story