Fourteen banks having taken a hit of around Rs 930 crore as depreciation for exposure to IFCI have conveyed to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) that accounting for the hit in 2007-08 would be difficult. |
The banks have urged the RBI to permit provisioning for depreciation in their investments in IFCI bonds over three-four years. |
|
This representation was made to the central bank when a team of bankers lead by M B N Rao, chairman and managing director of Canara Bank, and also the chairman of Indian Banks' Association (IBA), met RBI Deputy Governor Rakesh Mohan yesterday as part of the pre-monetary policy review consultation process. |
|
The fourteen public sector banks will take a combined hit of Rs 930 crore on their Rs 3,057 crore investment in IFCI as the RBI has asked them to transfer their exposure from the held-to-maturity (HTM) category to available-for-sale (AFS) category by March 31, 2008. State Bank of India (SBI), Canara Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) and UCO Bank will each take a hit of at least Rs 100 crore. |
|
Other banks having to make provision for the depreciation are Andhra Bank, Indian Bank, Punjab National Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, Dena Bank, Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Vijaya Bank, Punjab & Sindh Bank and Union Bank of India. |
|
In May, the central bank had asked banks with exposure to IFCI to transfer all their investments to the available-for-sale (AFS) category from the held-to-maturity (HTM) category by the end of June 2007. |
|
However, following a representation from the banks, the RBI had allowed the banks to spread the additional hit they would take over four quarters on a pro rata basis according to the market value at the end of each quarter, so that the full provisions were made by March 31, 2008. |
|
However, bankers said making provisions for the exposure would affect their profitability and wanted the RBI to reconsider its decision. |
|
Of the Rs 3,057 crore exposure, the banks have investments of Rs 1,071 crore in IFCI's SLR bonds and Rs 600 crore in non-SLR bonds. The remaining is in preference shares and other instruments issued by the term lending institution. |
|
Banks' investments in companies have to be mark-to-market, according to the RBI guidelines. Their investments in IFCI bonds and preference shares do not qualify under the held-to-maturity category. |
|
When the IFCI debt restructuring exercise was undertaken in 2002-03, the central bank had allowed the banks to hold their investments in IFCI in the HTM category. |
|
|
|