 "US cannot turn a blind eye to Syria: Obama")
Making a strong pitch for a "limited" military strike against the Syrian regime, US President Barack Obama today said America cannot "turn a blind eye" to the images emerging from the strife-torn country.
"We cannot turn a blind eye to images like the ones we've seen out of Syria," Obama said in his weekly address.
"We can't ignore chemical weapons attacks like this one, even if they happen halfway around the world. And that's why I call on Members of Congress, from both parties, to come together and stand up for the kind of world we want to live in, the kind of world we want to leave our children and future generations," he said.
He contended that the action in Syria "would not be another Iraq or Afghanistan".
The Obama administration has accused President Bashar al-Assad's forces of killing 1,429 people in a poison-gas attack in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21, a charge denied by the Syrian government.
A week ago, Obama had announced his decision to go in for a limited military strike against the Assad regime to hold it accountable for the use of chemical weapons and sought Congressional authorisation for it.
Both the House of Representatives and the Senate are expected to debate and vote on the authorisation resolution next week.
Obama's plans for a military strike against the Assad regime suffered a setback last week when his ally Prime Minister David Cameron's resolution seeking authorisation for action suffered a shock defeat in the British Parliament.
Many world leaders at the just-concluded G20 summit also did not agree with Obama's plans for a strike.
Obama and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin could not reach consensus yesterday when they met for "candid and constructive" talks on the sidelines of the G20 summit.
Justifying his plans for a strike, Obama said "This is not a decision I made lightly. Deciding to use military force is the most solemn decision we can make as a nation." He said this is not an open-ended intervention.
"We cannot turn a blind eye to images like the ones we've seen out of Syria," Obama said in his weekly address.
"We can't ignore chemical weapons attacks like this one, even if they happen halfway around the world. And that's why I call on Members of Congress, from both parties, to come together and stand up for the kind of world we want to live in, the kind of world we want to leave our children and future generations," he said.
More From This Section
Giving details of his plans for action against the embattled Syrian regime, Obama said, "There would be no American boots on the ground. Any action we take would be limited, both in time and scope, designed to deter the Syrian government from gassing its own people again and degrade its ability to do so."
He contended that the action in Syria "would not be another Iraq or Afghanistan".
The Obama administration has accused President Bashar al-Assad's forces of killing 1,429 people in a poison-gas attack in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21, a charge denied by the Syrian government.
A week ago, Obama had announced his decision to go in for a limited military strike against the Assad regime to hold it accountable for the use of chemical weapons and sought Congressional authorisation for it.
Both the House of Representatives and the Senate are expected to debate and vote on the authorisation resolution next week.
Obama's plans for a military strike against the Assad regime suffered a setback last week when his ally Prime Minister David Cameron's resolution seeking authorisation for action suffered a shock defeat in the British Parliament.
Many world leaders at the just-concluded G20 summit also did not agree with Obama's plans for a strike.
Obama and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin could not reach consensus yesterday when they met for "candid and constructive" talks on the sidelines of the G20 summit.
Justifying his plans for a strike, Obama said "This is not a decision I made lightly. Deciding to use military force is the most solemn decision we can make as a nation." He said this is not an open-ended intervention.