US-China trade war: Trust erosion makes prospect of any term deal remote

The emerging stalemate in US-China trade negotiations grew out of an earlier deadlock over how and when to remove existing American tariffs that provoked Beijing to threaten to walk away from talks, highlighting what people briefed on the discussions say are widening fundamental differences between the two sides.

Both the US and China have worked hard since the end of discussions on Friday to project calm and emphasize that they plan to continue negotiations in the hopes of avoiding a tumble in markets and broader economic damage.

But that facade masks what people close to the talks say has been a bigger erosion of trust that makes the prospect of any near-term deal remote, with US officials increasingly convinced that Chinese hardliners are winning the internal debate on reforms in Beijing.

President Donald Trump continues to weigh in on the state of negotiations, saying the US was “right where we want to be.” Meantime, Chinese state media blamed the US for the impasse and talked up its economic resilience, with the People’s Daily saying in a front-page commentary that the US should take full responsibility for the setbacks because it went back on its word and imposed more levies.

The ongoing uncertainty means more turmoil for financial markets: Stocks in Asia fell along with US equity futures, the yuan and Treasury yields.
 

The latest breakdown has prompted an escalation in the tariff war between the world’s two largest economies that looks increasingly like the International Monetary Fund and others’ worst-case scenario for a global economy already forecast to grow this year at its slowest rate since the immediate aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

On Monday, US officials are expected to announce details of their plans to impose a 25% additional tariff on all remaining imports from China -- some $300 billion in trade. Beijing is still working on its own retaliations to last week move by Trump to impose a 25% punitive tariff on more than 5,700 products worth some $200 billion annually.

Larry Kudlow, Trump’s top economic adviser, said on Sunday that no further talks had been scheduled, though he raised the possibility that Trump and President Xi Jinping will meet on the sidelines of a Group of 20 summit in Japan at the end of June.

In an interview with Fox News, Kudlow played down the economic impact of an escalation of tariffs by both sides, while conceding that economists and businesses were right when they challenged Trump’s assertion that China was paying the cost of the tariffs.

Losing some US jobs and taking a hit to growth was a reasonable risk to take to correct “decades” of unfair trade practices by Beijing, especially because the US economy is strong, Kudlow said.

The move to extend tariffs to all remaining imports from China would take several months, Kudlow said. But the tariffs remained part of an effort to get China to end its theft of intellectual property and other economic practices rather than a longer-term economic tool, he said.

“It is a negotiation and part of the negotiation is taking action,’’ he said.

While the Trump administration has taken that line for months, there are also some signs the president’s self-proclaimed fondness for tariffs may be backfiring.
 

According to people close to the talks, as the sides marched toward a deal that they hoped initially to close last week, they had gotten stuck in recent weeks on the question of lifting the US tariffs in response to Chinese steps to address American complaints. When the US insisted that it would leave tariffs in place, the Chinese threatened to blow up the discussions, according to two people familiar with the discussions.

That was followed by China’s early-May move to -- according to US officials -- backtrack on its agreement to enshrine concessions in law, offering instead to issue directives by the State Council. That reversal spurred Trump’s move last week’s to raise tariffs from 10% to 25% on a $200 billion tranche of imports from China.
 

Last week’s talks between Vice Premier Liu He, Xi’s top economic emissary, and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, were focused on that changing commitment but made little progress, according to people familiar with the discussions.

Lighthizer and his office didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Diminished Trust

Both sides are eager to portray the discussions as productive and ongoing in a bid to keep markets calm and ward off broader economic fallout and damage to things like business investment and sentiment. Ironically, such efforts could reduce the possibility of a deal and prolong the tariffs, one person close to the talks said. That’s because both sides will feel less pressure to do a deal if their economies and markets hold up.

People close to the talks said finding an agreement is likely to prove increasingly difficult with hardliners on both sides seeing the latest breakdown as evidence the other side cannot be trusted.

After polite words by both sides on Friday about “constructive” discussions, the rhetoric grew more heated over the weekend.

Trump on Saturday took to Twitter to taunt the Chinese. “I think that China felt they were being beaten so badly in the recent negotiation that they may as well wait around for the next election, 2020, to see if they could get lucky & have a Democrat win,’’ the president said.

In a series of editorials over the weekend, Chinese state media fired back that the US was provoking an escalating trade war that would in the end hurt Americans more than China.

“If the US is to play a roller-coaster-style thriller game, it will bear the consequences,’’ the state-run Global Times said in an editorial.

Trump’s hard line on China has been largely cheered by politicians in Washington, though Democrats have accused the president of alienating allies who might help apply more pressure on Beijing. But concerns that an escalating tariff war may end up hurting the US economy are also growing.

“The longer we’re involved in a tariff battle or a trade war, the better chance there is that we could actually enter into a recession,” Republican Senator Rand Paul said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday.