 "A fatal obsession")
This current mobile-only obsession by Indian e-commerce brands throws up some interesting questions:
1. What's the impact on search? The leading brands are going app-only (not only mobile web; Myntra doesn't let you see their mobile web version too and forces you to download app. Flipkart is heading there too). For example, if a user is going to use Siri, or its Android and Windows equivalents, I'm assuming they return results from respective search engines, right? If leading e-commerce stores hide behind their app gates, where does that leave them with search results?
Or, is search not important for them at all and they want people to only come to app with or without an intent and look up? That would be like me entering a mall (with multiple stores) with nothing specific in mind and start to window shop and end up buying something.
2. Earlier, these brands prioritised on one mobile OS ecosystem over the other based on numbers. So, they had an Android-first strategy given sheer number of Android users in India. Then, looking at the value created per user in iOS, they added that too.
With so much funds they have raised over time, you mean to say they are not willing to have even a small team to manage web version or mobile web verison of their websites and instead getting the entire team to focus only on the app version? I get it - some numbers being thrown around say that 90 per cent traffic is from mobile. But is all that 90 per cent via apps? Or does it include mobile web? Even if mobile web was say, 10 per cent traffic, 10 per cent of the mega million user base of these brands would still mean something. Enough to have a team focus on it, right?
Why go the Henry Ford way by forcing people to shop only one way? The number of times I have searched on Google for something, seen a Myntra link, clicked on it, only to be forced to download Myntra app is massive. In all those times, I have avoided downloading the app, used web version of the app in my mobile or Mac to continue shopping. That's just me, though - a strictly anecdotal example.
The sheer benefit of things going online is choice. Offline comes with its riders and constraints - in terms of space and cost. Online is seemingly endless. If online is going to force users to do things the shop's way ("You can shop only from that store of ours; other stores won't have stock"), aren't we going back to replicating the offline constraints-loaded model online too.
3. What if tomorrow (or eventually) Android Play Store or Apple app store rules are 'evolved' by their respective owners to include a higher cut from certain types of apps that go through more financial transactions than others? For example, I may transact only once or twice via a New York Times app, but may transact 10 plus times a month via a Flipkart app.
What if the mobile OS parents see this an opportunity to 'tweak' the rules a bit and seek higher charges per transaction from e-commerce apps? Does that sound silly, or preposterous?
Why? If the land-owner of a piece of a land on which a leased store exists can sense a bigger payout seeing the success of the store, can't the same happen with owners of Android and Apple store owners? Assuming something like this does happen, what will happen to the e-commerce players' 100 per cent focus on mobile app only strategy?
1. What's the impact on search? The leading brands are going app-only (not only mobile web; Myntra doesn't let you see their mobile web version too and forces you to download app. Flipkart is heading there too). For example, if a user is going to use Siri, or its Android and Windows equivalents, I'm assuming they return results from respective search engines, right? If leading e-commerce stores hide behind their app gates, where does that leave them with search results?
Or, is search not important for them at all and they want people to only come to app with or without an intent and look up? That would be like me entering a mall (with multiple stores) with nothing specific in mind and start to window shop and end up buying something.
2. Earlier, these brands prioritised on one mobile OS ecosystem over the other based on numbers. So, they had an Android-first strategy given sheer number of Android users in India. Then, looking at the value created per user in iOS, they added that too.
With so much funds they have raised over time, you mean to say they are not willing to have even a small team to manage web version or mobile web verison of their websites and instead getting the entire team to focus only on the app version? I get it - some numbers being thrown around say that 90 per cent traffic is from mobile. But is all that 90 per cent via apps? Or does it include mobile web? Even if mobile web was say, 10 per cent traffic, 10 per cent of the mega million user base of these brands would still mean something. Enough to have a team focus on it, right?
Why go the Henry Ford way by forcing people to shop only one way? The number of times I have searched on Google for something, seen a Myntra link, clicked on it, only to be forced to download Myntra app is massive. In all those times, I have avoided downloading the app, used web version of the app in my mobile or Mac to continue shopping. That's just me, though - a strictly anecdotal example.
The sheer benefit of things going online is choice. Offline comes with its riders and constraints - in terms of space and cost. Online is seemingly endless. If online is going to force users to do things the shop's way ("You can shop only from that store of ours; other stores won't have stock"), aren't we going back to replicating the offline constraints-loaded model online too.
3. What if tomorrow (or eventually) Android Play Store or Apple app store rules are 'evolved' by their respective owners to include a higher cut from certain types of apps that go through more financial transactions than others? For example, I may transact only once or twice via a New York Times app, but may transact 10 plus times a month via a Flipkart app.
What if the mobile OS parents see this an opportunity to 'tweak' the rules a bit and seek higher charges per transaction from e-commerce apps? Does that sound silly, or preposterous?
Why? If the land-owner of a piece of a land on which a leased store exists can sense a bigger payout seeing the success of the store, can't the same happen with owners of Android and Apple store owners? Assuming something like this does happen, what will happen to the e-commerce players' 100 per cent focus on mobile app only strategy?
The author is Karthik Srinivasan, a digital marketing expert. Reprinted with permission.
Link: https://bsmedia.business-standard.comitwofs.com/beastoftraal/2015/03/22/3-questions-about-indian-e-commerces-mobile-only-obsession/
Link: https://bsmedia.business-standard.comitwofs.com/beastoftraal/2015/03/22/3-questions-about-indian-e-commerces-mobile-only-obsession/