In late 2003, a multinational oil major offered to sell an Indian public sector power company liquefied natural gas (LNG) at $4.5-5 per million British thermal unit (mmbtu). | |
It was summarily turned down as an "overpriced" and "unviable" offer. Less than three years later, potential buyers from India "" including those who passed on the $4.5 offer "" are scrambling to buy LNG even at $7 or $8 per million British thermal units (mmbtu). It's a steal at that price: countries like Japan and South Korea are buying LNG at $11 and $20. | |
It's taken just three years to turn the market dynamics of the LNG industry on its head. With demand in India and China growing at 6-7 per cent a year, suddenly LNG is a suppliers' market. But it's no party for suppliers, either. Between buying gas at respectable prices from producers across the world and India, to selling them to customers like power plants and fertiliser companies at a profit-generating rate, the suppliers have their work cut out. | |
"India missed the bus in early 2002-03 when supplies were available but Indian consumers couldn't understand the pulse of the market and refused to take a call," declares Nitin Shukla, CEO, Shell Hazira LNG, the Indian subsidiary of Shell Gas and Power. What are Indian LNG suppliers doing to ensure events remain in their favour? | |
Building on demand First things first: this isn't a temporary situation. Natural gas is a clean fuel and given the rising costs of emission control equipment, Indian power generators are increasingly switching from coal-fired to gas-fired plants. As are auto makers. | |
Two months ago, India's largest car maker, Maruti Suzuki, launched a car with a factory-fitted LPG tank, the Wagon R Duo. Already, commercial passenger vehicles in New Delhi and Mumbai have switched to compressed natural gas. So demand for natural gas isn't going to taper off anytime soon. | |
Obviously, the demand is fuelling increases in the price of LNG. But there's another factor at work as well: the chronic gas shortages and the uncertainties related to international pipeline gas projects: both the Iran-Pakistan-India and the Myanmar-Bangladesh-India pipelines are still in the air. | |
A recent KPMG report on India's energy sector points out that in the long term, among the most lucrative areas for investment in the natural gas sector could be LNG facilities in areas where pipeline gas is not expected in the near future. | |
Some oil marketing companies have already taken that to heart. While ONGC is planning an LNG receiving terminal (where the gas will be imported and stored before being shipped out to customers) at its Mangalore complex, Indian Oil Corp has also announced its decision to set up an LNG terminal. | |
At Dabhol, NTPC and Gail, which own the power plant and the attached LNG facilities, are planning to sell the plant to an LNG operator such as Petronet LNG. | |
In turn, Petronet is considering doubling the plant's capacity from 5.1 mmtpa to 10 mmtpa, once it gets control of the facilities. It is also in talks with Qatar's Ras Gas to trade a stake in the Dabhol LNG facility in exchange for a long-term supply assurance. | |
The first task to cope with rising demand is to ensure supply. Globally, additional liquefaction capacity of 251 million tonnes per annum, or mmtpa (natural gas is measured in mmbtu when gaseous, and in mmtpa when in liquid form). That's in addition to the existing 157 mmtpa, and will be in place by 2010. Of this, 145 mmtpa is being set up east of the Suez, in West Asia, South East Asia, Australia and Brunei. | |
This will facilitate the creation of 90 million tonnes in Qatar, Iran and Yemen, and 57 mmtpa in the Pacific region. Africa (mainly Nigeria, Algeria, Angola and Egypt) could also become a major source of LNG, adding another 64 mmtpa by 2010-14. | |
In India, too, while the facilities at Dahej are being expanded, new capacities are being set up at Kochi, Dabhol, Ennore and Mangalore (see chart). While Dabhol will be operational by 2007 and the Kochi terminal by 2008 or early 2009, the Ennore and Mangalore terminals are in the initial stages. | |
In the meantime, of course, there's always the import option. And given the increasing mobility of gas internationally, geography in sourcing fuel is not likely to be an issue. | |
"Liquefied gas can be transported from just about anywhere to anywhere, which will make it easier for countries like ours to source gas," explains Banmali Agrawala, chairman and managing director of Wartsila India, a Swedish gas turbine maker. | |
Last year India imported 5 million tonnes of LNG, mainly from Qatar under a long-term supply agreement with RasGas. Late last year and early this year, Shell Hazira imported spot cargoes of 4-5 million tonnes of LNG from Oman and Australia. | |
This year, Petronet LNG has also imported a spot cargo from Egypt and plans to import even more before the end of the year. | |
| |
The price problem Of course, price remains a critical issue in LNG supply and demand. The section above explained why demand for LNG isn't likely to come down anytime soon. | |
But it's also important to remember that Indian buyers have accepted the high-price regime in LNG mainly because it replaces naphtha, which is almost 60-70 per cent more expensive than even the spot LNG price. | |
"As long as this difference continues, LNG will remain the preferred fuel," says Shukla. Which is why companies that haven't tied up long-term supply deals (which would offer some measure of price stability) are still buying LNG in the spot market. | |
Since demand will remain high, it follows that LNG prices, too, aren't likely to fall. Analysts point out that crude prices are an integral part of the LNG price mechanism, so gas prices may continue fluctuating in the higher ranges along with crude oil prices. | |
Prosad Dasgupta, CMD, Petronet LNG, has a firmer prediction. "The Henry Hub price [the daily spot price at Henry Hub in the US] may be $4-5 per mmbtu by 2010," he says. (Present rates are $4-6, but were higher recently.) | |
But how high and for how long remain unanswered questions. How should LNG suppliers deal with the uncertainty regarding future prices and supply? | |
By entering into medium- or long-term supply contracts. Typically, long- and medium-term contracts are for 20 and 10 years, respectively (that's changing now, though, and long-term is coming to mean 10-12 years). But there are still advantages in these agreements. | |
While the supplier ties up customer for his supply, he also benefits from some certainty regarding revenue streams. For buyers in a volatile market, like the one prevailing, long-term contracts are favourable because they are assured supply at prices that are more or less fixed. Japan and South Korea, for instance, have entered into long-term contracts with their suppliers world-wide. | |
In India, Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation (GSPC), the state government-owned hydrocarbon company, for instance, proposes to have its own terminal in Gujarat and has zeroed in on Mundra in Kuchchh and Pipavav near Bhavnagar as possible destinations, and is seeking long term supply arrangements. | |
"We have started looking for long-term supplies available in the market," confirms Saurabh Patel, minister for power and petrochemicals, Gujarat state government. GSPC isn't alone. Shell, too, is in discussion with buyers in India for long-term agreements. | |
Meanwhile, it is also considering entering into a long-term supply contract with a liquefaction project in West Asia that would benefit its receiving facility at Hazira, Gujarat. | |
D J Pandian, managing director, GSPC, sums up the issue: "Long-term agreements are the only answer to supply and price uncertainties." | |
| |