Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

No non-compete fee for public shareholders, rules SAT

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 2:09 AM IST

Setting aside an order of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), appellate tribunal SAT today ruled that a company need not pay non-compete fee to the public shareholders.

"The impugned communication [of Sebi]... so far as it directs the appellant to include the non-compete fee in the offer price, is set aside," the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) said in an order on an appeal filed by Cayman Island-based E-Land Fashion China Holdings.

The non-compete fee is the amount which is paid by the acquirer to the promoter of the target company to stay away from the same business.

In the present case, E-Land Fashion proposed to acquire Mudra Lifestyle and the issue was raised whether the acquirer was liable to pay non-compete fee to the public shareholders in addition to promoters.

In an order on January 28, 2011, Sebi held that E-Land Fashion Holdings will have to pay non-compete fee to public shareholders and include the amount in the offer price.

The company, however, approached SAT against the order of market regulator Sebi and obtained a ruling in its favour.

"The (non-compete) fee shall not be included in the offer price," SAT said, and allowed the company to issue the letter of offer to the shareholders within the next two weeks.

Also Read

First Published: May 24 2011 | 8:56 PM IST

Next Story