 "Sebi panel for lowering MFs' cost of investments")
The watchdog also wants fund houses to improve their disclosure regime and make it simpler for investors by doing away with too many schemes.
A slew of proposals is being discussed by Sebi's committee on mutual funds and a final decision would be taken soon by the regulator on the basis of recommendations of this panel, an official said.
Also Read
The proposed measures assume significance in the wake of a major crisis that erupted recently on account of a significant exposure of a small MF to distressed debt securities of a listed company, while concerns have been raised about similar exposures of quite a few other MFs.
Sources said SEBI Chairman U K Sinha, who did some plain speaking on these matters with mutual fund CEOs during the annual general meeting of the industry body AMFI (Association of Mutual Funds in India), is very serious about making mutual fund investment a preferred route for small investors to the capital markets.
However, it has been felt that a high cost of investment could be a major deterrent and some have blamed high agent commissions for this problem.
Another view is that many fund houses, including the large players, are mostly focussed on their corporate or high networth investors and a systemic change in required in their thinking to attract more small investors to these investments, the official said.
As it probes the issues related to high exposure of some fund houses to distressed debt securities, SEBI has found that the exposure to debt instruments downgraded by the rating agencies has increased substantially in recent months.
The quantum of such exposure rose almost three-fold in August to over Rs.13,000 crore, although the fund houses are putting the blame on rating agencies for a lackadaisical approach in due diligence before assigning a rating on corporate debt securities.
However, SEBI is of the view that the fund houses should not solely depend on rating agencies and they should do their own diligence and try to make an investment decision before the rating action, rather than afterwards, to take an early bird advantage.
During the meeting of SEBI's panel on MFs, it was felt that the foreign portfolio investors focus more on their own research and therefore they generally tend to move ahead of curve as compared to the domestic institutional investors such as mutual funds.
It was felt that Indian mutual funds need to improve on a lot of fronts to shed the wide-spread perception of their being followers to the FIIs on investment decisions.
Another major proposal in the works include asking the fund houses to move away from the current practice of having too many schemes, by merging similar plans.
Besides lowering the costs for MFs themselves, this would also make it easier for investors who often complaint of getting confused in a maze of too many schemes and plans offered by various fund houses.
While disclosure requirements for fund houses have been widened significantly over the recent years, SEBI is of the view that the quality of disclosures is not yet up to the mark in many cases and there is a big room for improvement.