Reliance Power's valuations are higher than its peers, which already have operational capacities, healthy cash flows and robust growth plans. |
The Reliance Power IPO has created ripples in the market, even before it has opened for subscription. For one reason at least, which relates to valuations--- the market already seemed to have had a hint about its aggressive pricing, which is partly responsible for the re-rating of the power generation stocks in the recent months. |
|
For now though, there are different views emerging with respect to its pricing. "Either the existing power generation companies are trading at low valuations or the initial public offering (IPO) of the Reliance Power is over valued". This is how most analysts reacted when asked about Reliance Power's valuation. |
|
"Considering traditional investment principals, one may not expect too much upside from a near-term perspective due to various concerns mentioned in the RHP. However, listing gains could accrue to applicants based on the market scenario at the time of listing," says Deepak Jasani, head of retail research, HDFC Securities. |
|
"We are neutral on the issue considering stiff valuations of about seven times its book value. However, at the same time we also believe that the execution of its projects should not be a problem and the group has never disappointed the share holders," says Lalit Thakkar, head of research, Angel Broking. |
|
On the other side, says Jigar Shah, head of research, KIM ENG, a Singapore-based foreign investor, "It is difficult to put any valuation parameter for the company, which is having huge projects and significant growth opportunities in the power sector. If these projects are executed in time and efficiently, it will create significant value for shareholders." Some others are also positive due to factors like aggressive management, backing of the ADAG group and emphasis on inorganic growth. PROJECTED CAPACITIES | Year | Capacity (MW) | Total | 2009 | NA | NA | 2010 | 4300 | 4300 | 2011 | 2500 | 6800 | 2012 | NA | 6800 | 2013 | 7540 | 14340 | 2014 | 5060 | 19400 | 2015 | 4200 | 23600 | 2016 | 4500 | 28100 | |
|
Some concerns While there are few doubts about the growth prospects in the sector and, hence, opportunities for companies like Reliance Power, there is a flip side too, including concerns regarding the long gestation of projects, supply of equipment and availability of fuel. |
|
For Reliance Power, which is setting up various power projects over the next seven to eight years, timely execution will be a challenging task. POWER ON | Project | Capacity (MW) | Procurement status | Fuel supply status | Offtake status | Cost (Rs Cr) | Commissioning by | Rosa Ph. I, UP | 600 | EPC signed | Agreement signed | Long term (LT) PPA signed with UPPCL | 2,702 | Dec 2009 / Mar 10 | Rosa Ph. II, UP | 600 | EPC signed | Applied to coal min. | 300 MW LT PPA proposed to UPPCL 300 MW MoU with Rel Energy Trad | 2,460 | June 2010 / Sep 10 | Butibori, Mah. | 300 | Bids invited | Applied to coal min. | LT PPA with captive consumers | 1,405 | Mar 2010 / Jun 10 | Sasan, MP | 3,960 | In progress | Captive mines allocated | LT PPA signed | 18,342 | May 2013 / April 16 | Shahapur Coal, Mah. | 1,200 | Bids invited | Coal sourcing MoU with RNRL | LT PPA to be arranged | 4,800 | Sep 2011 / Dec 11 | Urthing Sobla, Uttarakand | 400 | Awaiting DPR submission | N/A | LT or ST PPA to be arranged | 2,080 | Mar-14 | |
|
Its Butibori project, now scheduled to complete in June 2010, is already delayed and the government has stated that no additional extensions would be granted. Another project of 1,200 MW capacity in Shahpur, which is in the early planning stage, has also been delayed. |
|
The other issue relates to fuel linkages. Three of the six projects, equivalent to nearly 30 per cent of the planned 7,060 MW capacity (commissioning scheduled between December 09 and April 16) and being part-financed through the IPO, are yet to achieve fuel linkages (two projects have applied for linkages but are yet to receive confirmation). |
|
With regard to coal, the company is optimistic and expects the same to be addressed, including through tie-ups with global coal companies in the near future. However, availability as well as higher global coal prices remain a cause of concern. |
|
Of the other seven projects under development, which are scheduled for commissioning between 2010 and 2016 (combined capacity of 21,140 MW), three of them with a combined capacity of 14,280 MW are yet to achieve fuel linkages. |
|
Within these, for the gas-based projects of about 10,280 mw, the company has tied up with RNRL, a group company. Here too, the outcome of the dispute with Reliance Industries with regard to the supply of gas, will have a bearing on the company's plans. Simply because, as against the agreed price of $2.34 per mmbtu for gas, the current global price hovers around $8 per mmbtu. |
|
On the positive side, a part of the power generated is planned to be sold on a free-pricing (merchant power) basis, which should help generate higher blended ROE of about 16-18 per cent, compared to the fixed ROE of 14 per cent. But, that will happen only from 2010-11, the first full year of operations. FUTURE SHOW | Estimates for 2012 | Valuation Matrix | NTPC | Tata Power | Reliance Power | Current installed capacity (MW) | 27904 | 2368 | NA | New capacity (MW) | 22096 | 7763 | 7060 | Projected capacity (MW) | 50000 | 10131 | 7060 | Cost of new capacity (Rs cr) | 88384 | 31052 | 31789 | Debt required (Rs cr) | 29384 | 24000 | 22836 | Internal accruals (Rs cr) | 59000 | 7052 | 0 | Market capitalisation (Rs cr) | 218422 | 32510 | 101700 | M-Cap / Total Cap. at end-2012 (Rs cr) | 4.37 | 3.21 | 14.41 | Notes: * New capacity cost assumed Rs 4 crore per MW; Reliance Power's cost is taken from the RHP * Debt required for NTPC and Tata Power is based on internal accruals, while for RPL it taken from RHP * M-Cap to capacity at end-2012 reflects market value in Rs crore per megawatt * In NTPC's case, internal accruals based on cash profit of Rs 10,000 crore and is assumed to grow at 8% annually, a little lower than new capacity growth * Tata Power is estimated to generate total cash profits of over Rs 7,000 crore till 2012 * Tata Power and NTPC had cash/investments worth Rs 8,000 crore and Rs 29,000 crore respectively as on March 2007, excluding which, valuations are cheaper * M-cap of RPL is based on listing price of Rs 450 /share. | |
|
Conclusion At the offer price of Rs 385-430 for retail investors (considering the discount of Rs 20), Reliance Power is valued at about seven times its post-IPO book value, compared with four times for players like NTPC and Tata Power. While some premium may be considered, assuming the potential for the higher blended ROE, the valuations still look stiff. |
|
Even in terms of the market value per megawatt, the valuation looks expensive. If one deducts the investments and cash balance of Rs 29,000 crore for NTPC and Rs 8,000 crore for Tata Power (as on March 2007), the valuations only turn dearer. |
|
Interestingly, by the time Reliance Power's six power projects (combined capacity of 7,060 MW) go on stream by 2012, NTPC would be having in excess of 50,000 MW of capacity operational, and would be generating Rs 15,000-20,000 crore of cash profit annually--more than sufficient to fund future projects of the company. |
|
By then, Tata Power would be at over 10,000 MW. And by 2016-17, when Reliance Power's entire 28,200 MW capacity goes on stream, NTPC's capacity would be over 75,000 MW. In these circumstances, it makes sense to stick to the larger, established players in the business. Issue opens: January 15, 2008 Issue closes: January 18, 2008 |
|