New Delhi, May 14 (ANI): Terrorists in Kashmir took their bloody toll yet again with the brutal killing of two Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel on Monday (May 11).
Chief Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed must be ruing the day when he, rather prematurely, offered a hand of friendship to the separatist, divisive and terrorist forces. His attempts towards generating goodwill have clearly been construed as an act of appeasement by these evil forces and can motivate them to increase the threshold of violence in the state.
The cycle of violence began with a deadly terror attack at Kathua, Jammu, on March 20, days after the Mufti-led coalition government took oath of office, and Mufti made public his policy of appeasement. In this attack on four people, three J-K policemen were killed.
The latest attack in the Kashmir Valley is the third in the last few days. On Saturday (May 9), many civilians were injured in a grenade attack at a market in Shopian in South Kashmir. On April 6, a group of terrorists in army uniforms killed three policemen in Shopian.
It is widely believed that Mufti has directed his police force to desist from arresting or detaining anybody under the Public Security Act (PSA). The directive followed by this ruthless targeting of police personnel would have negatively affected the morale of the police force. Mufti will now have to work overtime to contain the damage.
If this is the reaction of the terrorist and disruptive elements to the conciliatory policy of the state government and scaling down of the PSA, imagine what would happen if a decision is taken to scale down the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA.
Also Read
It is not without reason that security experts and other sane voices are in agreement with the opinion expressed by the Indian Army that the time is not right in Jammu and Kashmir for any change in the security paradigm and that tinkering with the AFSPA will have grave security implications.
Coming back to the issue of terrorist-initiated violence, those who have a proclivity to hype situations, have been building a doomsday picture of the security scenario in the Kashmir Valley.
Predictions of a possible revival of the terrifying days of the 1990's abound. Those were the days when terrorism was at its peak and terrorists called the shots in many areas of the state, especially in the Kashmir Valley.
It can be said with complete confidence that the security forces led by the Indian Army and supported by the local populace, will never ever allow the situation to degenerate to the 1990 level. The separatist and divisive forces simply do not have the capacity to engineer a revisit of that situation
It is a fact, however, that the Pakistan Army, which dictates Pakistan's Kashmir policy, has no intention of registering a letdown in its proxy war against India.
The officers of the army are fully aware that what they are doing goes against established norms of soldiering. A proxy war fought through unconventional means is unethical, immoral and dishonourable. No soldier in the world who is worth his salt will ever indulge in such activity.
In order to save face, the Pakistan Army has left the direction of the process in the hands of the unscrupulous and secretive Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) that in turn is using fundamentalist Jihadists to do the dirty work on ground.
Even under trying circumstances, where the Pakistan Army is fending off a virtual civil war along its western border, it has not let the focus move away from Kashmir.
The level of involvement has gone down due to a constraint of resources, but, a minimum threshold is being maintained. This will definitely be upgraded and escalated the moment the army gets a respite from its existing problems; the escalation will be done at both the operational and political level.
India should, therefore, remain ready for a drastic increase in terrorist activity coupled with a financially and politically resurrected Hurriyat. This will come by much sooner than expected and the gruesome murder of the CRPF soldiers is a grim reminder of the same.
Presently, terrorists are active more in urban areas, mostly in the Pulwama-Shopian-Kulgam belt, which lies on the periphery of summer capital Srinagar.
Terrorists are also pointedly attacking security forces, mainly police and paramilitaries. There are many reasons for the same. First, terrorists do not wish to further alienate the local populace, for which reason, the outsider security force personnel are a more lucrative target. Second, an attack on security forces in an urban environment, elicits more media coverage than the killing of a poor villager in a remote area. Lastly, such acts and the inability to react, lower's the morale of the security forces, thus, giving a psychological advantage to the terrorist.
The newly installed government of Jammu and Kashmir should remain well aware and upfront about the terrorist intention while looking at the larger picture. The medium term perspective clearly points toward an increase in destabilizing activities.
The media should ensure that it plays a nationalist role in this fight against terrorism.
The low coverage given to the martyrdom of two brave soldiers of the CRPF indicates that a lot of ground still needs to be covered in this regard.
In a well regarded newspaper like Hindustan Times, the act was covered as a small business like piece on Page 16 as part of the short stories segment. Electronic media did not cover the incident adequately, if at all. Surely it deserved much more than this considering that Geelani and Mirwaiz get preferential treatment with photographs.
There is reason to be happy about the improved situation in Jammu and Kashmir, but the job is not over and done with as yet. The sooner this realization dawns to all concerned, the better would it be for national security.
.