Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

Sonia Gandhi disappointed with SC verdict on Section 377

Image
ANI New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 12 2013 | 2:20 PM IST

Congress President Sonia Gandhi on Thursday expressed her disappointment over the Supreme Court's verdict that consensual sex between adults of the same gender is not permissible under natural law, and will be treated as an offence.

"I am disappointed that the Supreme Court has reversed a previous Delhi High Court ruling on the issue of gay rights," she said in a statement.

She further expressed hope that the Parliament would guarantee life and liberty to all citizens of the country.

"I hope Parliament will address this issue and uphold the constitutional guarantee of life and liberty to all citizens of India, including those directly affected by this judgement," she said.

Describing the earlier Delhi High Court verdict as wise, Gandhi said: "The High Court had wisely removed an archaic, repressive and unjust law that infringed on basic human rights enshrined in our Constitution."

In a major setback for the largely closeted homosexual community in India, the apex court had on Wednesday said gay sex between consenting adults is a criminal offence.

More From This Section

The apex court set aside the Delhi High Court's 2009 judgement that homosexuality should not be treated as a criminal offence, which had been challenged by anti-gay rights activists, social and religious organisations.

The apex court had reserved its order in March last year, after day-to-day hearing in the case lasted an entire month.

The Delhi High Court had in 2009 decriminalised gay sex as provided in Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and had ruled that sex between two consenting adults in private would not be an offence.

Section 377 (unnatural offences) of the IPC makes gay sex a criminal offence entailing punishment up to life term. Senior BJP leader BP Singhal has challenged the high court verdict in the Supreme Court, saying such acts are illegal, immoral and against the ethos of Indian culture.

Religious organisations like All India Muslim Personal Law Board, Utkal Christian Council and Apostolic Churches Alliance too have challenged the judgement.

Also Read

First Published: Dec 12 2013 | 2:10 PM IST

Next Story