Targeting estrogen receptor increases progression-free survival in advanced breast cancer

Image
ANI Washington D.C.[USA]
Last Updated : Oct 09 2016 | 2:28 PM IST

Fulvestrant significantly increases progression-free survival in women with positive advanced breast cancer, particularly those with less aggressive lower-volume disease, reports a recent research.

Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor degrader that targets the function of the hormone receptor so, unlike aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole, it does not interfere with estrogen levels themselves.

The randomized, double-blind, multi-center phase III trial enrolled 462 women with inoperable locally-advanced or metastatic ER-positive, HER-negative breast cancer, who had not received prior hormone therapy.

Half the patients (n=230) were randomized to 500mg intramuscular injections of fulvestrant (Days 0, 14, 28, then every 28 days), or to 1mg of anastrozole daily (n=232), and were also allowed one line of chemotherapy.

After a median follow-up of 25 months, patients treated with fulvestrant had a statistically significant 21 percent improvement in progression-free survival compared to those treated with anastrozole (16.6 months vs. 13.8 months, p = 0.048).

However, subgroup analysis showed an even greater impact on progression-free survival in patients whose disease had not spread to the liver or lungs at baseline (22.3 vs. 13.8 months).

Study's principle investigator Matthew Ellis said, "For patients with non-visceral disease whose life isn't immediately threatened by breast cancer - a group for whom physicians would typically choose endocrine therapy as a first approach - it looks like fulvestrant could be a new standard of care compared to anastrozole."

Both groups showed a similar health-related quality of life and the most common adverse events were arthralgia (joint pain) (16.7 percent vs. 10.3 percent) and hot flushes (11.4 percent vs. 10.3percent) for fulvestrant and anastrozole, respectively.

"It's tolerated as well as anastrozole, and better than other drugs that could potentially be used in this setting such as chemotherapy or CDK4 inhibitors," Ellis said.

Adding, "In patients for whom you are looking for a low toxicity approach, such as older patients or those with low volume disease, it looks like a good option."

Researchers also observed a significantly greater duration of response to treatment in the fulvestrant group compared to the anastrozole group, which Ellis suggested could account for the increase in progression-free survival.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 09 2016 | 1:31 PM IST

Next Story