Some trends are easy to spot. The big metros don’t rank well – in India or internationally. Mumbai and Delhi (and Kolkata for that matter) rarely rank high, while internationally the most liveable cities have been mid-range ones like Vienna, Auckland, and Vancouver – though Melbourne did very well for a long stretch. The biggest European, American, and Chinese cities are not the most liveable, partly because they usually have the most expensive real estate. In addition, there are the usual problems of commuting time and pollution. Japan maintains the trend, in that Osaka outscores Tokyo.
A second trend is that cities south of the Vindhyas do well (no surprise there!), plus the big three of Gujarat. For cost of living as well as health care, two of the seven metrics used for a global ranking on Quality of Life, places like Mangalore, Coimbatore, Chennai, and Thiruvananthapuram score well. That is within the larger context of Indian cities mostly tending to figure in the third quartile from the top. This unimpressive showing is influenced by poor income levels and the hot weather. Many of India’s best cities are therefore on the Deccan plateau, giving them an elevation that makes for a less forbidding summer. Indore is at the edge of the Malwa plateau (elevation: 1,800 feet) while Coimbatore (1,350 feet) gives easy access to the Nilgiris.
If India is to urbanise successfully, it has to focus on these Tier 2 cities with a population of one-five million. Some of them are getting attention in the government’s Smart Cities programme, which is fine but inadequate without structural changes like directly elected mayors, a sensible property tax system, designs for being made citizen- and bicycle-friendly, and rules for floor-area ratios to enable high-rise office towers, required to create a central business district and avoid urban sprawl.
But there is also a lesson in the fact that the big metros, though they fare poorly on Quality of Life, continue to be magnets for latter-day Dick Whittingtons. Indeed, the standard feature of successful cities is that they welcome people from elsewhere, which is why Mumbai has so many Gujaratis, Parsis, South Indians and, once upon a time, Baghdad Jews. It is also why Delhi has become less Punjabi-dominated, and why Kolkata in its heyday had so many non-Bengalis, including Chinese, Armenians, and others. It is this mix that makes metros more interesting and cosmopolitan, while smaller cities stay provincial.
Bengaluru is an interesting case study. It is outranked by Coimbatore and Mangalore on many metrics (e.g. pollution, health care, safety), yet it usually ranks at or near the top as the most liveable, despite having acquired the problems of a car-oriented metropolis. Its climate, cosmopolitan air, affordable real estate, and high rating on the purchasing power index (presumably because of its tech-powered elite) make it the city of choice for those who wish to escape Mumbai’s real estate prices (rated among the most unaffordable in the world, relative to income) and the poorly ranked Delhi-Gurgaon-Noida). Yet, the fastest growth is in the Tier 2 cities – Surat’s population has increased by an average of more than 70 per cent for four decades. The success or failure of India’s future urbanisation will be written in such cities.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe To BS Premium
₹249
Renews automatically
₹1699₹1999
Opt for auto renewal and save Rs. 300 Renews automatically
₹1999
What you get on BS Premium?
-
Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
-
Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in