Defence Ministry comes to life

New defence procurement policy is a giant step forward

Slowing economic growth, a depreciating rupee, and a string of arms purchase scandals that tarnished the ministry of defence (MoD) and scuttled ongoing purchases of weaponry together made a powerful case for building rather than buying defence equipment for India's military. In the dozen years since defence production was opened to foreign direct investment (with a 26 per cent cap) and to private Indian companies, the MoD has published a series of limp policies that merely paid lip service to indigenisation. Successive Defence Procurement Procedures (DPPs) of 2002, 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2011 took baby steps when giant strides were needed, creating despondency and mistrust within the private sector.

The latest procurement policy, DPP-2013, which the MoD cleared on Saturday, is a dramatic departure. The new acquisition procedure explicitly recognises that India's private sector is as Indian as the public sector behemoths. Now the Tata group, Larsen & Toubro, Bharat Forge and a multitude of others will be entitled to know what technologies and weaponry the military hopes to procure in the future, allowing these companies the lead time to develop and build these complex systems. Even more significantly, an import-happy military will no longer be allowed to import defence systems by deploying the convenient argument that any delay would endanger national security. Instead, the military must foresee its requirements well in advance, and project them to industry through a publicly available "Technology Perspective and Capability Road Map". Only if industry fails to develop the required equipment will import be considered. While long-range plans have always been shared with the defence public sector undertakings, the DPSUs have consistently failed to meet the military's needs. And the private sector has long been kept out on flimsy grounds of "security".

The DPP's details are not yet out; it is hoped that the fine print contains no devils. Also, indigenisation could yet be scuttled if the military refuses to accept into service indigenously developed weaponry on the grounds that better equipment can be bought elsewhere. The MoD must, therefore, explicitly mandate the concepts of "spiral development" and "capability-based deployment", which encourages the military to accept indigenously developed equipment into operational service, even when it falls marginally short of the laid-down specifications. This allows user feedback to be ploughed into a "Mark II" version of the equipment that meets or even surpasses the operational requirements. DPP-2013 has also not addressed a number of crucial issues, such as exchange rate variation (ERV) protection for private defence companies. This places the Indian private sector at a serious competitive disadvantage while bidding against foreign vendors. When the DPSUs are given ERV protection, why not their private counterparts? The gainer will be Indian defence capability.