General Electric's bid for Alstom's power unit could indirectly help transform the French engineering group into the train-building equivalent of Europe's aircraft maker Airbus. The French government seems to think the way to achieve this is to oppose the American's bid and favour a rival approach by German group Siemens. At the very least, Paris suggests GE should sell its own train unit to Alstom in exchange. But the ideal solution would instead be for Alstom to use GE's money to buy Siemens' own train business. And, it would still be left with Euro 5.4 billion to return to its shareholders.
The strategic logic of a Franco-German train merger is strong. Separate, the two businesses struggle to compete on a global scale with upcoming rivals from China. With expected joint 2015 sales of Euro 11 billion, Alstom-Siemens trains would be a strong global No. 3. Siemens is already preparing a counterbid whereby it would acquire Alstom's energy assets and bring the French its own train unit. But the potential deal is shrouded in regulatory uncertainty due to the large overlap between Siemens' and Alstom's power businesses. Getting Brussels' approval for "Trainbus" might prove tough if it is associated with a big-bang consolidation in the power industry. On the other hand, the GE bid - favoured by Alstom's board - would increase competition in many markets and may be approved more easily.
GE is offering Euro 9.9 billion in cash. Assume Euro 3 billion go to lowering the remaining Alstom debt to 0.5 times Ebitda. Siemens' trains are worth around Euro 1.5 billion. That would leave some Euro 5.4 billion - Euro 17.50 per share - for Alstom to pay out a special dividend or launch a share buyback. True, Siemens might be reluctant to play ball if it is rebuked in its bid for Alstom. But the German group has long had problems with its train unit. With sales of Euro 3.1 billion, it is a mid-sized player and it has been dogged with technical issues.
Alstom, on the other hand, makes a 5.4 per cent operating margin on trains. French expertise, higher purchasing volumes, and more efficient R&D could generate Euro 300 million in annual synergies. If the French do not seize the opportunity to buy their big European rival, the risk is that someone else will.
The strategic logic of a Franco-German train merger is strong. Separate, the two businesses struggle to compete on a global scale with upcoming rivals from China. With expected joint 2015 sales of Euro 11 billion, Alstom-Siemens trains would be a strong global No. 3. Siemens is already preparing a counterbid whereby it would acquire Alstom's energy assets and bring the French its own train unit. But the potential deal is shrouded in regulatory uncertainty due to the large overlap between Siemens' and Alstom's power businesses. Getting Brussels' approval for "Trainbus" might prove tough if it is associated with a big-bang consolidation in the power industry. On the other hand, the GE bid - favoured by Alstom's board - would increase competition in many markets and may be approved more easily.
GE is offering Euro 9.9 billion in cash. Assume Euro 3 billion go to lowering the remaining Alstom debt to 0.5 times Ebitda. Siemens' trains are worth around Euro 1.5 billion. That would leave some Euro 5.4 billion - Euro 17.50 per share - for Alstom to pay out a special dividend or launch a share buyback. True, Siemens might be reluctant to play ball if it is rebuked in its bid for Alstom. But the German group has long had problems with its train unit. With sales of Euro 3.1 billion, it is a mid-sized player and it has been dogged with technical issues.
Alstom, on the other hand, makes a 5.4 per cent operating margin on trains. French expertise, higher purchasing volumes, and more efficient R&D could generate Euro 300 million in annual synergies. If the French do not seize the opportunity to buy their big European rival, the risk is that someone else will.