A merger between DuPont and Dow Chemical would be an activist coup on Corporate America. The US chemical giants, each valued at roughly $60 billion, are in advanced talks, according to Reuters, a testament to the persistence of pushy investors Daniel Loeb and Nelson Peltz. If the century-old companies pull off a deal and a reported three-way split, it could be this generation's version of barbarians at the gate.
Hedge fund billionaires have spent two years pushing for big changes at the producers of everything from plastics to genetically modified seeds to Kevlar body armour. In January 2014, Loeb said his Third Point fund held a significant stake in Dow and urged a spin-off of its petrochemicals unit. The firm eventually agreed to add four new independent directors in return for Loeb's signature on an agreement not to agitate further. That so-called standstill agreement expires next week.
Earlier this year, after months of private talks, Peltz's Trian Partners launched a proxy fight aimed at getting DuPont's then chief executive Ellen Kullman to separate the company's agriculture, nutrition and biosciences units from its slower-growing building and safety materials divisions. He lost the battle but held on to his shares, and Kullman was ousted five months later after the company warned of lower profit. Her replacement, Ed Breen, who presided over a major restructuring at Tyco International, quickly put a break-up back on the table.
In 1988, KKR's acquisition of RJR Nabisco - immortalised in the best-selling book, Barbarians at the Gate - proved that no blue-chip boardroom was safe from a new class of corporate raiders. Today's gate crashers are more interested in influence than ownership. But if Loeb and Peltz succeed in pushing two of America's biggest and most time-honored companies to, in effect, dismantle themselves, it would be no less of an historic moment.
Hedge fund billionaires have spent two years pushing for big changes at the producers of everything from plastics to genetically modified seeds to Kevlar body armour. In January 2014, Loeb said his Third Point fund held a significant stake in Dow and urged a spin-off of its petrochemicals unit. The firm eventually agreed to add four new independent directors in return for Loeb's signature on an agreement not to agitate further. That so-called standstill agreement expires next week.
Earlier this year, after months of private talks, Peltz's Trian Partners launched a proxy fight aimed at getting DuPont's then chief executive Ellen Kullman to separate the company's agriculture, nutrition and biosciences units from its slower-growing building and safety materials divisions. He lost the battle but held on to his shares, and Kullman was ousted five months later after the company warned of lower profit. Her replacement, Ed Breen, who presided over a major restructuring at Tyco International, quickly put a break-up back on the table.
Also Read
A merger of equals, followed by a split into separate companies concentrating on agriculture, speciality chemicals, and materials, would cement the activists' influence. Peltz in particular has long championed breaking up stodgy conglomerates to improve their focus and free management of the separate parts from the control of a bureaucratic head office.
In 1988, KKR's acquisition of RJR Nabisco - immortalised in the best-selling book, Barbarians at the Gate - proved that no blue-chip boardroom was safe from a new class of corporate raiders. Today's gate crashers are more interested in influence than ownership. But if Loeb and Peltz succeed in pushing two of America's biggest and most time-honored companies to, in effect, dismantle themselves, it would be no less of an historic moment.