The United States may find technology groups are a riskier tool of foreign policy than banks. America has long used its dominance of international finance to compel foreign lenders to enforce US sanctions. New restrictions on China's ZTE are an extension of the principle. But targeting technology has larger ramifications at home.
Until now, overseas banks were the main targets of America's extraterritorial reach. US officials demanded that foreign lenders help enforce sanctions against unfriendly countries such as Iran and North Korea. When banks disobeyed they faced increasingly large fines, culminating in the $8.9-billion penalty paid by BNP Paribas in 2014. Governments complained that the United States was enlisting foreign firms to fight its diplomatic battles. The banks had little choice, however: no large financial institution can credibly function without a US licence.
Now ZTE is learning the cost of sanctions-busting. The US Commerce Department has slapped an effective export ban on all stateside suppliers to the Chinese telecom equipment firm, massively disrupting its supply chain. The Shenzhen-based firm's alleged offence was channelling US-made technology to Iran, in a direct breach of sanctions.
On the face of it, ZTE has been caught red-handed. Alongside its ruling, the Commerce Department released company documents from 2011 which set out how it planned to avoid the restrictions. One states explicitly that ZTE is using US technology in Iran, Sudan, North Korea, Syria and Cuba - in breach of sanctions. Another document, labelled "Top Secret", has the revealing title "Proposal for Import and Export Control Risk Avoidance". It even includes a flow chart setting out how ZTE can dodge controls.
The Chinese company says it is talking to the US government about a solution. Even if it finds one, however, the latest show of American force could have broader consequences. US suppliers will suffer if ZTE is forced to cancel orders, while Chinese manufacturers are bound to rethink their dependence on US-made hardware and software. China could respond by taking an even tougher approach to foreign tech firms operating in the People's Republic.
As long as the U.S dollar is the world's reserve currency, financial sanctions have few costs for America. Extending the same approach to technology, however, is much more risky.
Until now, overseas banks were the main targets of America's extraterritorial reach. US officials demanded that foreign lenders help enforce sanctions against unfriendly countries such as Iran and North Korea. When banks disobeyed they faced increasingly large fines, culminating in the $8.9-billion penalty paid by BNP Paribas in 2014. Governments complained that the United States was enlisting foreign firms to fight its diplomatic battles. The banks had little choice, however: no large financial institution can credibly function without a US licence.
Read more from our special coverage on "ZTE"
Now ZTE is learning the cost of sanctions-busting. The US Commerce Department has slapped an effective export ban on all stateside suppliers to the Chinese telecom equipment firm, massively disrupting its supply chain. The Shenzhen-based firm's alleged offence was channelling US-made technology to Iran, in a direct breach of sanctions.
On the face of it, ZTE has been caught red-handed. Alongside its ruling, the Commerce Department released company documents from 2011 which set out how it planned to avoid the restrictions. One states explicitly that ZTE is using US technology in Iran, Sudan, North Korea, Syria and Cuba - in breach of sanctions. Another document, labelled "Top Secret", has the revealing title "Proposal for Import and Export Control Risk Avoidance". It even includes a flow chart setting out how ZTE can dodge controls.
The Chinese company says it is talking to the US government about a solution. Even if it finds one, however, the latest show of American force could have broader consequences. US suppliers will suffer if ZTE is forced to cancel orders, while Chinese manufacturers are bound to rethink their dependence on US-made hardware and software. China could respond by taking an even tougher approach to foreign tech firms operating in the People's Republic.
As long as the U.S dollar is the world's reserve currency, financial sanctions have few costs for America. Extending the same approach to technology, however, is much more risky.