Why is Mazars batting for joint auditing?
The issue is about choice of audit firms. There is a perception that choice of audit is now largely restricted to four firms, popularly referred to as “The Big Four”. The debate has been on for many years whether the four firms have the capacity to manage almost all companies globally. In case one of them happens to fail or withdraws from the audit market, the choice will get further limited.
We feel that there should a healthy choice of eight to 12 audit firms to choose from. So joint auditing is one of the ways of creating capacities in the market. The perception in the market is skewed towards the ‘Big Four’. Joint auditing will give an opportunity to firms like us to increase their scale and change that perception. Today Mazars is among the top five audit firms in France. That is largely due to joint auditing. Most top French companies have one of the Big Four as auditor and Mazars.
This issue is about building capabilities to do audit on a global scale. Building that choice of eight to 12 global audit firms is a long process. Governance and regulation needs to take that responsibility.
How has been France’s experience of joint auditing?
France did not introduce joint auditing in the 1960s to build capacity. Rather, they felt it gave better assurance and quality to readers of financial statements. It creates automatic checks and balances. When both auditors sign the financial statement, we are risking on each other’s work. Both the auditors plan the audit together, allocate work and take joint decisions on major issues. We also review each other’s work.
After several decades of joint audit in France, the top 250 listed companies are audited by 101 audit firms. In India, 25 companies (other than PSUs and banks) among top 100 companies are audited by 26 firms.
Joint audit promotes a diverse audit market by providing an incentive for new audit firms to invest in expertise and geographic coverage. They are a powerful capacity building measure.
One perception is that the debate around joint audit is about foreign audit firms versus Indian-owned firms. Do you agree with that?
The Big Four (in India) are not foreign-owned but owned by their partners who are Indian. The debate is about concentration of work and the problems the economy will face because of that concentration. It will be good for everyone if one of the top 10 audit firms globally is from India, China or Africa. One could also look at creating a giant Indian audit firm by promoting mergers and through joint audits.
Will joint audit not lead to additional compliance costs for businesses?
The additional costs for clients will not exceed five per cent. We are ready to absorb that and not pass it on to clients. Joint audit creates a more competitive environment in the market.
Are you banking on joint audit to ramp up India presence?
We are anyway looking at taking the inorganic route to scale-up presence in India, both in terms of reach and headcount. We plan to have 1,500-2000 people in India over the next three years. Currently our India head count is around 750.
As of now, around 50 per cent of our India business comes from auditing, the rest from tax consultancy and advisory services. Going forward the share of audit in India business will come down even though it will grow in size.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe To BS Premium
₹249
Renews automatically
₹1699₹1999
Opt for auto renewal and save Rs. 300 Renews automatically
₹1999
What you get on BS Premium?
-
Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
-
Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in