It is important for the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) to maintain credibility to attain longer-term objectives of price stability and higher growth. The comments made by Jayanth Varma, an external member of the MPC, in the last policy meeting and an interview to this newspaper on Monday highlighted important issues regarding the conduct of the monetary policy and they need to be widely debated. Mr Varma had expressed his reservations on maintaining the accommodative stance and argued that the current reverse repo rate was too low and needed to be raised. Interestingly, the MPC of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is legally not in a position to adjust the reverse repo rate — the only instrument it has is the repo rate. The reverse repo rate can be changed by the RBI.
In the current circumstance, where the banking system has significant excess liquidity, the reverse repo rate has become the operating rate. In fact, the abundance of liquidity in the system has pushed short-term market rates below the reverse repo rate and has effectively made the policy repo rate redundant. The reverse repo rate was seen to be connected to the repo rate until the RBI reduced it disproportionately in March 2020 to make the policy corridor asymmetric, which surprised many observers because it effectively undermined the MPC. Arguably, if the RBI was of the view that interest rates needed to go down, it could have been done through the MPC by reducing the policy rate. A disproportionate reduction in the reverse repo rate, along with the infusion of liquidity into the system, has pushed short-term market rates significantly below the policy repo rate of 4 per cent.
Mr Varma notes that an interest rate close to the reverse repo rate of 3.35 per cent is lower than what is now desirable. An interest rate close to the 4 per cent mark would be more appropriate. Thus, increasing the reverse repo rate would help narrow the policy corridor and increase market rates.
The RBI, however, has maintained it would continue to focus on reviving growth. The inflation rate has surprised the central bank on the upside and the RBI expects it to average 5.7 per cent in the current year. Since the rate was above the tolerance band in the last fiscal year, there is a risk that sustained higher inflation can affect expectations. As Mr Varma noted in the MPC, by creating the perception that the committee was focused on growth and not concerned about inflation, it might be increasing the risk of inflationary expectations getting dis-anchored. This would also increase risk premium and push up long-term rates. The RBI must avoid such an outcome. It is also worth pointing out that these are still early days for the inflation-targeting framework in India and it’s important for the RBI to not risk credibility.
Therefore, the MPC should convince the market that it is not ignoring inflation risks. In this context, even before raising the reverse repo rate, the RBI can adjust the liquidity position and bring the short-term market rates within the policy corridor. This itself will send a signal to the market. It would also create conditions for reversing the disproportionate reduction in the reverse repo rate later in the year. General confidence in the MPC’s ability to contain inflation will allow it to keep the policy rate at a lower level for a longer period.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month