For rewards, get execution right
The Uday Kotak committee has further enhanced the role and responsibilities of audit committees by recommending:
- Expansion of nature and type of disclosures such as long- and medium-term strategy and valuation reports in searchable and standard format
- Focus on key deltas in financial indicators and their causes
- Capital deployment details to be disclosed
- Analysis and comments on audit qualifications
- Enhanced quarterly disclosures, scope of internal controls and the need to establish guidelines for audit quality
- Auditor credentials disclosure, fees and reasons for resignation
- More frequent audit committee meetings, with sharp agenda items on cyber security, the vigil mechanism, the quality and effectiveness of internal controls, enhancing the quality of disclosures and valuation processes for various purposes.
- Longer meetings with a great deal of preparation. More than power points, a continuous engagement with the chief financial officer and company secretary will be crucial to bring about real change.
- Very stringent processes for accomplishing the onerous tasks, requiring planning and engagement of a much higher order.
As a set of individuals involved in this very special task, all of us will have to raise our commitment, engagement and time spent. The rewards will be for those who get the implementation right. Boards will have to give enough time to audit committees to present their findings. Ultimately, I have no doubt that this will lead to better shareholder value creation.
Missed opportunity on reforming PSEs
The Uday Kotak committee-recommended policy changes to the existing corporate governance framework for listed public sector enterprises (PSEs) acknowledges that PSEs face unique governance challenges. The committee recommended the government clearly stipulate strategic goals for PSEs, specifically its “non-commercial objectives”.
In Singapore, Temasek is a single holding entity for all PSEs and reports to the Ministry of Finance. The Kotak committee has recommended adoption of a similar structure for Indian PSEs by April 1, 2020. This is aimed at providing functional autonomy and reducing conflict of interest. Apart from laying down a timeline which might be an overreach, the committee has treaded with caution to avoid a turf war with the administrative ministry.
The “evolution not revolution” approach of the committee is praiseworthy but so far as the issue of corporate governance for PSEs is concerned, it’s a clear miss.
The committee has not considered revocation of the exemptions provided to government companies under various legislations such as the Companies Act, 2013, Competition Act, 2002, and listing regulations which provide preferential treatment to PSEs.
Further, the committee has not recommended any specific mechanism for protection of rights of minority investors of a PSE. The committee should also have looked at state PSEs for there is a lacuna in corporate governance guidelines for state PSEs.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe To BS Premium
₹249
Renews automatically
₹1699₹1999
Opt for auto renewal and save Rs. 300 Renews automatically
₹1999
What you get on BS Premium?
- Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
- Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
- Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
- Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
- Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in