However, this major devolution has not been accompanied by the rethinking of the Centre's own role. If, for example, responsibility for supervision and funding of major welfare schemes have been passed on to the states, then why is the size of the relevant ministries in New Delhi unchanged? Surely, there should have been redistribution and rationalisation of resources as a consequence of a dramatically changed mission profile. It is worth remembering that Prime Minister Narendra Modi swept into power with the motto "minimum government, maximum governance". There is a chance here to, if not minimise government, then at least to cut it down to a more rational size. There is no reason why vast ministries should continue to exist when their functions have been devolved elsewhere. Indeed, the staff in those ministries, if they have developed some competence in the administration of the schemes that are now housed elsewhere, could in fact be distributed between the state capitals that are desperately short of capacity to match their new powers.
In general, there are questions of administrative reform that this government has not even begun to address. The absence of such reform was a major black mark against the previous United Progressive Alliance government. But the latter did at least start work on a template, which now exists. The National Democratic Alliance has a packed agenda, which it has only just begun to implement. Regardless of the energy of its leaders and the competence of the bureaucrats they choose, that agenda will nevertheless be difficult for an unreformed bureaucracy to conceptualise and implement. Many of the problems that led to the confusions and errors of the UPA's later years emerged, in fact, from this very problem. The higher bureaucracy, in particular, must be opened up to more competitive promotion; posts should no longer be rendered exclusive to particular services or cadres, but left open to an appointments process supervised by someone accountable. This will allow area experts a way into a system hitherto dominated by generalists. Another salutary effect of such openness is that it will also reduce the pressure to preserve the status quo absolutely unchanged even when circumstances change - exactly what is happening at the moment, as the administrative structure in New Delhi is yet to accept that devolution has even happened.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories
Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app