The Supreme Court’s concerns are, in this instance, justifiable. It is not difficult to see how the use of a national security criterion, no matter how unexceptionable it sounds, that the government does not have to explain could lead to arbitrariness. And once arbitrary choice from the executive is allowed into the process, then outright politicisation will not be far behind. The purpose of the MoP drafting exercise is to ensure that a good balance is found between accountability and politicisation, and including a national security veto for the executive in the MoP will militate against that balance. Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has questioned the judiciary’s attitude in Parliament, saying that “the Prime Minister of India possesses the nuclear button… but cannot be trusted to appoint a fair judge”. But the minister is missing the point. The constitutional requirement of independence of the various branches of government means that processes must not give one branch – the executive, in this case – excessive power over another branch that is supposed to act as a counterweight. The nuclear button is the executive’s domain, but that does not mean that the head of the executive is all-powerful.
There are other, puzzling aspects to this debate over the “national security” veto. For one, even if the collegium demands that a government put down in writing what threats a particular individual poses to national security, it is difficult to imagine what such material could look like. If there is indeed a national security consideration, then why would government action wait until that individual is up for a judgeship? Surely other action will and should have been taken already. Overall, the government should recognise that it will not be able to exercise an open veto over the judicial appointments process. It should seek instead to ensure that the body making appointments has access to all the relevant information about a candidate and that the process is open, wide-ranging and transparent. The visible friction between the Supreme Court and the government on the subject of appointment has gone on long enough and is not in the national interest. Both sides must work harder to find a solution swiftly.
To read the full story, Subscribe Now at just Rs 249 a month
Already a subscriber? Log in
Subscribe To BS Premium
₹249
Renews automatically
₹1699₹1999
Opt for auto renewal and save Rs. 300 Renews automatically
₹1999
What you get on BS Premium?
-
Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
-
Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in