The stream of reforms she is proposing, including to land and labour legislation, is in many cases long overdue. Unfortunately, most of the laws in question were, in fact, part of the central statute book, although they deal with issues that are, in the Constitution, part of the "concurrent list" that is supposed to be shared between the Centre and the states. It is argued that these state-level changes to central legislation can stand if the president gives his assent. This, however, may be subject to challenge in the courts; only time will tell. However, given that the central government - although it, too, has a massive mandate - seems unwilling to spend political capital on radical reform, that Ms Raje is taking it up should be welcomed. The Rajasthan Assembly has already passed state-level amendments to several labour laws - the Industrial Disputes Act, the Factories Act, the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act and the Apprentices Act. The land acquisition law is also set to change, reducing the proportion of landowners whose consent is required and - perhaps problematically - making even objecting to acquisition an offence. Land, of course, is a state subject, so Rajasthan can amend the law without any problems.
This newspaper has now reported that Ms Raje is also planning to move ahead with her own alternative to the Aadhaar unique ID scheme, which will focus on the female head of a household as the target for benefit transfers. It is argued that this will help existing schemes that focus on the household dovetail better with the electronic architecture. While questions may continue to be raised about whether a move away from Aadhaar is a good idea, Ms Raje's emphasis on direct benefit transfers should nevertheless be praised. Other states should follow suit.