The Meenakumari committee, set up by the present government, has observed that productivity from the coastal zones has either plateaued or is on the decline due to over-exploitation. There is, therefore, little scope for raising fish output in waters up to a depth of 200 metres. However, waters beyond a 500-metre depth are not optimally tapped and, thus, offer considerable scope for augmenting fish output. This zone abounds in tuna and tuna-like species, which are in great demand globally. Significantly, this panel has also alluded to the fact that the Indian fishing industry is, by and large, ill-equipped - in terms of technology as well as finance - to adequately tap these resources. The panel has suggested that the Indian fishing companies should be encouraged to either get hold of larger and well-equipped fishing ships or form joint ventures with foreign companies. The inadequacy of Indian fishing activity in the EEZ has left the field open for poaching by foreign trawlers. The current growth in the country's overall fish production is, thus, contributed almost entirely by inland fisheries.
Traditional fishermen are also uncomfortable with the Meenakumari panel's counsel to create a buffer zone between the near-shore and offshore regions (between 200 metres and 500 metres in depth) to augment resources in the coastal as well as deep-sea regions. Though it is still unclear whether the buffer zone will be a "no-go" area or selective fishing will be allowed, fisherfolks generally tend to view it as a denial of their right to operate in these waters. This ambiguity needs to be removed - and, in general, the concerns of traditional communities addressed - for early result.