Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

TV industry: Where supply outstrips demand

Indian TV viewership and ad demand is witnessing a de-growth

TV industry: Where supply outstrips demand
Vineet Sodhani
Last Updated : Dec 20 2017 | 10:38 PM IST
It is interesting to see how Indian broadcasting is evolving. Channels with only SD feeds are launching HD versions. From first to second line GECs… started with Hindi and now rolling to other languages. Similarly from first line movie channels to second rung ones. This year also saw quite a rush to launch free-to-air (FTA) channels. In most industries so many launches/re-launches would be a sign of high demand or some kind of a gap plugging. Let us check all indicators.

Do viewers need more choices?


BARC (Broadcast Audience Research Council, the agency that monitors and releases TV viewership numbers) analysis will show on a like to like market and target group comparisons, quantum of TV viewing has gone down. If one were to extrapolate the BARC TV viewership data, the increase in the number of TV viewers is 10 per cent while the quantum of TV viewing (GRPs: Gross Rating Points) has gone up by 8 per cent. Therefore, relatively speaking, quantum of TV viewing has actually gone down by 2 per cent compared to last year (table).

Do advertisers want more channels?

Through personal interactions with many leading advertisers, I can tell you no one wants new channels. They want good content and good properties, but not new channels. If you look at the demand data (inventory sold, table), you will notice some startling facts. First, 61 per cent of the available inventory went unsold until October as demand fell by 5 per cent compared to 2016. Secondly, most genres are selling below 50 per cent of their inventory. The table sufficiently argues more channels aren’t required, at least from the demand perspective.

Does it help to have more channels for better subscription revenue?

A qualified yes. More channels mean TV networks get better bargaining power with the distributors. But this is increasingly become theoretical. The idea is to make more money out of subscription revenue. However, if it were that simple, distributors would have themselves launched new channels. A recent case in point was a leading broadcaster’s foray into quality content with a Hindi movie channel which in spite of good content fell flat as distributors did not agree to its a la carte pricing. This year a lot of new channels either got launched or got converted to FTA with the intention of garnering mass viewership. Meanwhile, the government is not renewing the licences of the FTA channels, so where does it leave them?

Drift to whatever, whenever

A recent report by Trai showcased how DTH active subscriber base growth has slowed down from 52 per cent (Apr-June 16 over Apr-June 15) to 8 per cent (Apr-Jun 17 over Apr-Jun 16). Compared to that the OTT user base had moved from 63 million in August ’16 to 164 million in August ’17. As the drift moves to smartphones pre-embedded with OTT apps, low cost of data and the freedom to watch whatever, whenever, wherever, does it help the Indian broadcasting industry to launch new channels?

Laws of pure economics

It all boils down to demand for content and advertising. While both consumers and advertisers are welcoming good content (as we can see from the growth of time spent on Netflix), question is if it is via new channels? If not, then why are these channels being launched? Close to 70 new channels were launched this year (table), mostly in genres that saw no growth in viewership or inventory demand from advertisers. A few of these channels, mostly from the news genre, are more like mouthpieces of political parties, but what about the rest?
 
More channels means more supply. And supply not supported by demand leads to price erosion in the long run. We can already see that in some genres. I won’t be surprised if the fire engulfs the whole forest sooner than we imagine.

The author is CEO, Spatial Access

Next Story