The one act of commission in the policy statement is the lowering of the statutory liquidity ratio, or SLR, from 22.5 per cent to 22 per cent. Although seen by some as a sign of back-door easing, with a little more space for banks to expand credit, it has a different significance. In his inaugural speech last year, Dr Rajan spoke about reducing "pre-emptions", of which the SLR is the primary example. It forces banks to lend to government in return for an exemption from mark-to-market requirements, which goes against the grain of contemporary prudential frameworks. It also poses a significant barrier to the development of a meaningful government securities market. A gradual reduction in the SLR and the accompanying mark-to-market exemption are presumably how the RBI is going to deal with the situation. In line with this, the mark-to-market exemption limit was also reduced to 24 per cent. However, with those objectives in mind, the rate of reduction for both parameters is much too slow. As part of the larger market development and prudential management strategies, the RBI has to significantly accelerate the pace of adjustment.
Overall, maintaining the status quo was the right thing to do. The RBI governor is clearly taking every precaution to ensure that his inflation-fighting credentials are not diluted in any way. This requires standing firm in the face of a tangible softening of inflation, on the grounds that this is a transitory pattern. In resisting the inevitable pressure to cut rates, including some statements by the finance minister, he is helped by some tangible signs of recovery in growth. The latest Index of Industrial Production numbers were the best in almost two years and subsequent readings of the Purchasing Managers' Index were significantly positive. This would suggest that the economy is accommodating the interest rate regime and there aren't significant downside risks to growth from it. Meanwhile, several actions by the government - virtually freezing the procurement price for paddy, open market sales of cereals and deterring state governments from offering additional incentives for cereal procurement - bode well for containing food inflation. After quite a while, the government and the RBI appear to be walking together.