"I welcome the judgement. If not immediately, it will eventually improve the quality of candidates fielded by political parties," Krishnamurthy told PTI. He was the CEC between February 2004 and May 2005.
He said he had initiated the move in 2001 but could not proceed further since he was faced with legal issues over including the 'reject' option while moving from paper to electronic voting.
"Eventually it has happened after seven to eight years and I am happy," he said.
Gopalaswami, who was the CEC for three years between June 2006 and April 2009, said the judgement could be a 'stepping stone' towards voters getting the option to reject (a single candidate), if it was taken in the right note.
Also Read
He pointed out that earlier, those who did not wish to vote for any contestant, had to tell the polling officer about it (to record his rejection in a relevant form), which would reveal his identity.
Explaining the difference between negative voting and the right to reject, he said, "Now you can allow voters to select none among the options. Right to reject is where you can reject (any one of the) candidates fielded."
In a landmark verdict, Supreme Court has held that citizens had a right to cast negative vote rejecting all candidates contesting an election and directed Election Commission to provide a 'none of the above' option in electronic voting machines and on ballot papers.