Special CBI Judge O P Saini said if these documents were allowed to be placed on record at this stage, it would lead to a "huge task" of comparing it with the documents which were already on record and examining further witnesses to prove it and this might result in delay in the trial.
"There is danger of some delicate and sensitive issues getting prejudged and accused may get prejudiced by filing of such large mass of documents, even if they are replica of earlier documents," the court said.
CBI had filed the application in April this year seeking court's permission to place on record the certified copies of certain documents.
Many of the accused had opposed CBI's plea contending that the agency cannot be allowed to fill up the lacunae and filing of such documents would prejudice their case.
The court said: "How a properly proved document can again be properly proved. This plea of the prosecution is beyond understanding. It is not clear as to what the prosecution wants to do. In a sense, it is just duplication of work."
"However, in the instant case, an attempt is being made to file about 15,000 pages of documents without explaining as to what these documents are, what were the objections and how these objections have now been cured or taken care of," the court noted.
Giving details of the documents in the case, the court said evidence in the matter runs into about 4,500 typed pages.
"The documents sought to be filed run into about 15,000 pages. It is a gargantuan task to compare these huge number of pages to find out if what is being said by the prosecution is true or not regarding the curing of defects as well as the documents being exact replica of documents already on record both in nature and contents and details," it said.
The court also said that if 15,000 pages of documents were suffering from deficiency regarding proper certification, "it itself is a comment on the party trying to place them on record. Deficiency in such large number of documents is not a simple defect which can be cured or allowed to be cured."
Former Telecom Minister A Raja, DMK MP Kanimozhi and 15 others are facing trial in the case.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)